Thursday 14 November 1935
1935 UK general election results
The Conservatives won the most seats: 365 of the 582 single-member and unopposed seats the source breaks down by party (33 seats in two-member and university constituencies are not split by party in the source). Afterwards: National Government under Stanley Baldwin, with Stanley Baldwin as prime minister.
33 seats are not allocated to parties here. They were in two- and three-member constituencies (some towns and the universities), where the House of Commons Library dataset gives votes by party rather than by candidate. The Library’s own published totals for this election, including those seats, are Conservative 429 and Labour 154 (its Conservative figure includes allied groups).
| Party | Seats | Change | Votes | Share | Change | Share bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | 365 | −88 | 10,032,102 | 47.7% | −7.3 | |
| Labour | 154 | +107 | 7,989,273 | 38.0% | +8.5 | |
| National Liberal | 28 | +3 | 827,331 | 3.9% | +1.0 | |
| Liberal | 20 | −14 | 1,415,019 | 6.7% | −0.3 | |
| National Labour | 7 | −11 | 302,245 | 1.4% | −0.7 | |
| Others | 4 | +3 | 316,215 | 1.5% | +0.6 | |
| Independent Labour Party | 4 | 0 | 132,338 | 0.6% | −0.5 |
Change is compared with the 1931 general election. Before 2010 “Others” groups all smaller parties and independents, as in the source.
Nations and regions
Closest results
- Staffordshire Kingswinford Lab by 16 votes
- Middlesbrough East Lab by 67 votes
- Southwark North Nat Lib by 79 votes
- Leicester West Nat Lab by 87 votes
- Ashton under Lyne Lab by 114 votes
- Leyton West Lab by 128 votes
- Glasgow Kelvingrove Con by 149 votes
- Liverpool Everton Lab by 177 votes
- Brigg Lab by 203 votes
- Barrow in Furness Con by 217 votes
125 seats changed hands
Compared with the previous general election, where the constituency had the same boundaries.
- Labour gained 79 from Conservative
- Labour gained 11 from Liberal
- Labour gained 7 from National Labour
- Labour gained 5 from National Liberal
- Conservative gained 4 from Liberal
- National Liberal gained 4 from National Labour
- Labour gained 3 from National
- Liberal gained 3 from Conservative
- Others gained 2 from Conservative
- Labour gained 1 from Independent Labour
Every constituency
Download CSV| Constituency | Winner | Majority | % | Turnout | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aberdeen North | Lab | 2,962 | 8.5 | 65.9% | Lab gain from Con |
| Aberdeen South | Con | 13,453 | 36.3 | 65.9% | Con hold |
| Aberdeenshire and Kincardineshire Central | Con | 8,569 | 32.1 | 66.8% | Con hold |
| Aberdeenshire and Kincardineshire Eastern | Con | 3,121 | 14.0 | 62.4% | Con hold |
| Aberdeenshire and Kincardineshire Kincardine and Western | Con | 2,636 | 11.8 | 75.6% | Con hold |
| Accrington | Con | 4,070 | 8.8 | 87.1% | Con hold |
| Anglesey | Lib | 4,182 | 16.6 | 74.4% | Lib hold |
| Antrim | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Argyll | Con | 1,774 | 7.2 | 56.6% | Con hold |
| Armagh | Con | 17,718 | 35.2 | 73.3% | Con hold |
| Ashton under Lyne | Lab | 114 | 0.4 | 81.0% | Lab gain from Con |
| Ayr District of Burghs | Con | 12,619 | 32.2 | 73.0% | Con hold |
| Ayrshire and Bute Bute and Northern | Con | 9,033 | 25.3 | 66.6% | Con hold |
| Ayrshire and Bute Kilmarnock | Nat Lab | 6,557 | 17.4 | 78.8% | Nat Lab hold |
| Ayrshire and Bute South Ayrshire | Lab | 4,804 | 15.2 | 78.0% | Lab gain from Con |
| Banffshire | Con | 603 | 2.6 | 70.5% | Con gain from Lib |
| Barnsley | Lab | 7,635 | 17.8 | 82.6% | Lab gain from Nat Lib |
| Barrow in Furness | Con | 217 | 0.6 | 85.4% | Con hold |
| Bath | Con | 12,020 | 32.9 | 74.5% | Con hold |
| Batley and Morley | Lab | 2,828 | 7.2 | 79.3% | Lab gain from Con |
| Battersea North | Lab | 5,203 | 17.4 | 63.5% | Lab gain from Con |
| Battersea South | Con | 5,447 | 14.7 | 66.8% | Con hold |
| Bedfordshire Bedford | Con | 8,872 | 24.6 | 73.1% | Con hold |
| Bedfordshire Luton | Nat Lib | 13,628 | 31.0 | 63.3% | Nat Lib hold |
| Bedfordshire Mid | Con | 4,431 | 13.9 | 76.3% | Con hold |
| Belfast East | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Belfast North | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Belfast South | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Belfast West | Con | 13,747 | 25.3 | 68.0% | Con hold |
| Berkshire Abingdon | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Berkshire Newbury | Con | 15,517 | 46.0 | 65.5% | Con hold |
| Berkshire Windsor | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Bermondsey Rotherhithe | Lab | 4,665 | 19.3 | 71.3% | Lab gain from Con |
| Bermondsey West Bermondsey | Lab | 4,929 | 24.3 | 65.8% | Lab hold |
| Berwickshire and Haddingtonshire | Con | 5,540 | 16.2 | 71.9% | Con hold |
| Bethnal Green North East | Lab | 4,937 | 27.1 | 55.5% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Bethnal Green South West | Lib | 1,066 | 6.3 | 61.7% | Lib hold |
| Birkenhead East | Lib | 6,694 | 19.4 | 74.2% | Lib hold |
| Birkenhead West | Con | 3,753 | 11.9 | 74.7% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Aston | Con | 10,355 | 37.6 | 64.7% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Deritend | Con | 4,781 | 19.1 | 59.6% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Duddeston | Con | 3,262 | 15.5 | 53.7% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Edgbaston | Con | 21,862 | 63.1 | 62.4% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Erdington | Con | 9,959 | 21.0 | 65.5% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Handsworth | Con | 15,225 | 46.1 | 61.7% | Con hold |
| Birmingham King'S Norton | Con | 5,875 | 13.6 | 74.6% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Ladywood | Con | 11,254 | 43.5 | 66.0% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Moseley | Con | 26,342 | 42.9 | 60.7% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Sparkbrook | Con | 9,446 | 36.9 | 57.3% | Con hold |
| Birmingham West Birmingham | Con | 7,371 | 28.7 | 63.6% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Yardley | Con | 6,838 | 15.3 | 65.2% | Con hold |
| Blackburn | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 84.9% | |
| Blackpool | Con | 34,916 | 47.0 | 74.0% | Con hold |
| Bolton | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 76.8% | |
| Bootle | Con | 3,368 | 9.8 | 71.3% | Con hold |
| Bournemouth | Con | 19,366 | 42.2 | 62.6% | Con hold |
| Bradford Central | Lab | 1,156 | 3.7 | 66.0% | Lab gain from Con |
| Bradford East | Con | 2,193 | 6.5 | 73.1% | Con hold |
| Bradford North | Con | 7,103 | 17.8 | 72.4% | Con hold |
| Bradford South | Lib | 6,960 | 16.9 | 70.4% | Lib hold |
| Breconshire and Radnorshire | Oth | 2,169 | 5.2 | 84.3% | Oth gain from Con |
| Brigg | Lab | 203 | 0.6 | 74.2% | Lab gain from Con |
| Brighton | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 62.6% | |
| Bristol Central | Con | 1,516 | 5.1 | 72.8% | Con hold |
| Bristol East | Lab | 6,883 | 18.5 | 75.8% | Lab hold |
| Bristol North | Lib | 4,828 | 13.0 | 73.2% | Lib hold |
| Bristol South | Lab | 2,433 | 5.4 | 76.9% | Lab gain from Con |
| Bristol West | Con | 21,762 | 42.0 | 70.8% | Con hold |
| Bromley | Con | 27,941 | 47.4 | 65.1% | Con hold |
| Buckinghamshire Aylesbury | Con | 11,106 | 25.8 | 70.2% | Con hold |
| Buckinghamshire Buckingham | Con | 5,688 | 16.0 | 75.1% | Con hold |
| Buckinghamshire Wycombe | Con | 15,930 | 29.7 | 61.4% | Con hold |
| Burnley | Lab | 4,195 | 7.2 | 87.6% | Lab gain from Nat |
| Bury | Con | 5,580 | 15.0 | 83.3% | Con hold |
| Caernarvon District of Boroughs | Lib | 9,609 | 33.3 | 77.4% | Lib hold |
| Caernarvonshire | Lib | 1,497 | 4.1 | 74.9% | Lib hold |
| Caithness and Sutherland | Lib | 7,450 | 44.6 | 60.0% | Lib hold |
| Camberwell Dulwich | Con | 9,728 | 35.1 | 65.8% | Con hold |
| Camberwell North | Lab | 5,777 | 32.0 | 55.6% | Lab gain from Con |
| Camberwell North West | Con | 813 | 3.4 | 59.3% | Con hold |
| Camberwell Peckham | Con | 772 | 2.6 | 64.8% | Con hold |
| Cambridge | Con | 5,491 | 17.0 | 73.2% | Con hold |
| Cambridge University | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 53.5% | |
| Cambridgeshire | Con | 7,650 | 21.4 | 67.8% | Con hold |
| Cardiff Central | Nat Lab | 4,860 | 14.8 | 68.7% | Nat Lab hold |
| Cardiff East | Con | 4,686 | 15.6 | 73.1% | Con hold |
| Cardiff South | Con | 541 | 1.9 | 75.8% | Con hold |
| Cardiganshire | Lib | 5,761 | 22.2 | 65.1% | Lib hold |
| Carlisle | Con | 2,635 | 7.7 | 88.3% | Con hold |
| Carmarthenshire Carmarthen | Lab | 5,235 | 13.7 | 79.3% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Carmarthenshire Llanelli | Lab | unopposed | — | — | Lab hold |
| Chelsea | Con | 12,644 | 49.9 | 61.7% | Con hold |
| Cheltenham | Con | 10,790 | 40.9 | 70.4% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Altrincham | Con | 29,226 | 40.5 | 72.0% | Con hold |
| Cheshire City of Chester | Con | 6,699 | 20.0 | 77.9% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Crewe | Con | 1,109 | 2.6 | 80.3% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Eddisbury | Nat Lib | unopposed | — | — | Nat Lib hold |
| Cheshire Knutsford | Con | 12,999 | 27.4 | 76.3% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Macclesfield | Con | 9,488 | 20.6 | 78.9% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Northwich | Con | 4,027 | 9.0 | 77.9% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Stalybridge and Hyde | Con | 5,073 | 11.0 | 78.7% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Wirral | Con | 25,816 | 45.0 | 69.7% | Con hold |
| City of London | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Combined English Universities | Con | unopposed | — | — | |
| Combined Scottish Universities | 3-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 51.2% | |
| Cornwall Bodmin | Con | 2,753 | 7.9 | 82.3% | Con gain from Lib |
| Cornwall Camborne | Con | 6,905 | 22.5 | 66.9% | Con hold |
| Cornwall Northern | Lib | 836 | 2.5 | 79.9% | Lib hold |
| Cornwall Penryn and Falmouth | Con | 3,031 | 7.4 | 77.6% | Con hold |
| Cornwall St Ives | Nat Lib | unopposed | — | — | |
| Coventry | Con | 2,472 | 3.4 | 81.1% | Con hold |
| Croydon North | Con | 18,511 | 34.1 | 64.6% | Con hold |
| Croydon South | Con | 17,071 | 33.3 | 65.2% | Con hold |
| Cumberland Northern | Lib | 894 | 3.7 | 83.9% | Lib gain from Con |
| Cumberland Penrith and Cockermouth | Con | 6,460 | 28.7 | 78.4% | Con hold |
| Cumberland Whitehaven | Lab | 352 | 1.2 | 87.3% | Lab gain from Con |
| Cumberland Workington | Lab | unopposed | — | — | Lab hold |
| Darlington | Con | 4,215 | 10.4 | 84.8% | Con hold |
| Daventry | Con | 8,167 | 27.5 | 76.0% | Con hold |
| Denbighshire Denbigh | Nat Lib | 5,043 | 14.6 | 75.1% | Nat Lib hold |
| Denbighshire Wrexham | Lab | 5,283 | 12.6 | 75.5% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Deptford | Lab | 6,892 | 14.6 | 69.3% | Lab gain from Con |
| Derby | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 77.0% | |
| Derbyshire Belper | Con | 828 | 2.1 | 76.8% | Con hold |
| Derbyshire Chesterfield | Lab | 4,884 | 11.6 | 79.8% | Lab gain from Con |
| Derbyshire Clay Cross | Lab | 16,199 | 49.1 | 73.6% | Lab hold |
| Derbyshire High Peak | Con | 9,586 | 27.0 | 72.2% | Con hold |
| Derbyshire Ilkeston | Lab | 10,601 | 28.6 | 81.7% | Lab gain from Nat Lab |
| Derbyshire North Eastern | Lab | 9,580 | 21.6 | 77.9% | Lab gain from Con |
| Derbyshire Southern | Con | 1,859 | 3.1 | 73.5% | Con hold |
| Derbyshire Western | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Devonshire Barnstaple | Lib | 454 | 1.2 | 83.8% | Lib gain from Con |
| Devonshire Honiton | Con | 13,889 | 43.8 | 69.6% | Con hold |
| Devonshire South Molton | Nat Lib | 15,157 | 57.5 | 72.9% | Nat Lib hold |
| Devonshire Tavistock | Con | 4,053 | 12.2 | 77.9% | Con hold |
| Devonshire Tiverton | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Devonshire Torquay | Con | 17,935 | 42.2 | 71.0% | Con hold |
| Devonshire Totnes | Con | 7,176 | 15.5 | 79.2% | Con hold |
| Dewsbury | Lab | 5,268 | 17.7 | 80.8% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Dorset Eastern | Con | 14,171 | 29.7 | 74.4% | Con hold |
| Dorset Northern | Con | 3,184 | 12.2 | 79.7% | Con hold |
| Dorset Southern | Con | 9,057 | 29.7 | 70.1% | Con hold |
| Dorset Western | Con | 2,090 | 8.2 | 77.9% | Con hold |
| Down | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 64.4% | |
| Dudley | Con | 2,449 | 9.6 | 75.3% | Con hold |
| Dumbarton District of Burghs | Lab | 9,500 | 30.3 | 78.8% | Lab gain from Ind Lab |
| Dumfriesshire | Nat Lib | 10,368 | 30.7 | 73.6% | Nat Lib gain from Lib |
| Dunbartonshire | Con | 4,097 | 8.3 | 80.5% | Con hold |
| Dundee | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 84.7% | |
| Dunfermline District of Burghs | Lab | 1,423 | 4.6 | 81.6% | Lab gain from Nat Lib |
| Durham Barnard Castle | Lab | 1,320 | 5.7 | 84.2% | Lab gain from Con |
| Durham Bishop Auckland | Lab | 8,086 | 24.6 | 79.2% | Lab gain from Nat Lib |
| Durham Blaydon | Lab | 9,526 | 24.6 | 80.8% | Lab gain from Con |
| Durham Chester Le Street | Lab | 17,210 | 42.0 | 78.2% | Lab hold |
| Durham Consett | Lab | 7,522 | 17.4 | 83.8% | Lab gain from Nat Lab |
| Durham Durham | Lab | 6,607 | 18.1 | 85.2% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Durham Houghton Le Spring | Lab | 7,675 | 14.3 | 82.0% | Lab gain from Con |
| Durham Jarrow | Lab | 2,350 | 6.1 | 80.8% | Lab gain from Con |
| Durham Seaham | Lab | 20,498 | 36.4 | 86.3% | Lab gain from Nat Lab |
| Durham Sedgefield | Lab | 1,771 | 4.5 | 81.4% | Lab gain from Con |
| Durham Spennymoor | Lab | 12,767 | 42.3 | 74.4% | Lab hold |
| Ealing | Con | 18,500 | 48.1 | 69.1% | Con hold |
| East Ham North | Con | 533 | 1.8 | 65.0% | Con hold |
| East Ham South | Lab | 5,956 | 18.7 | 66.6% | Lab gain from Con |
| Eccles | Con | 2,255 | 5.3 | 80.0% | Con hold |
| Edinburgh Central | Con | 2,953 | 12.6 | 64.5% | Con hold |
| Edinburgh East | Lab | 1,112 | 3.6 | 68.6% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Edinburgh North | Con | 12,122 | 38.8 | 66.7% | Con hold |
| Edinburgh South | Con | 21,889 | 67.1 | 67.6% | Con hold |
| Edinburgh West | Con | 14,229 | 34.0 | 68.1% | Con hold |
| Edmonton | Lab | 4,127 | 10.4 | 64.5% | Lab gain from Con |
| Essex Chelmsford | Con | 16,624 | 41.6 | 65.4% | Con hold |
| Essex Colchester | Con | 5,876 | 17.3 | 74.6% | Con hold |
| Essex Epping | Con | 20,419 | 34.6 | 67.7% | Con hold |
| Essex Harwich | Nat Lib | 12,546 | 40.6 | 63.9% | Nat Lib hold |
| Essex Maldon | Con | 7,808 | 24.4 | 73.8% | Con hold |
| Essex Romford | Lab | 8,307 | 8.1 | 61.4% | Lab gain from Con |
| Essex Saffron Walden | Con | 10,036 | 34.3 | 69.2% | Con hold |
| Essex South Eastern | Con | 970 | 1.7 | 59.5% | Con hold |
| Exeter | Con | 7,518 | 21.6 | 75.9% | Con hold |
| Fermanagh and Tyrone | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 82.4% | |
| Fife Eastern | Nat Lib | 21,899 | 64.5 | 71.0% | Nat Lib gain from Nat Lab |
| Fife Western | Oth | 593 | 1.7 | 77.8% | Oth gain from Con |
| Finsbury | Lab | 2,808 | 11.7 | 56.2% | Lab gain from Nat Lab |
| Flintshire | Con | 10,108 | 17.0 | 76.3% | Con gain from Nat Lab |
| Forfarshire | Con | 4,583 | 20.4 | 71.5% | Con hold |
| Fulham East | Con | 1,054 | 2.9 | 71.9% | Con hold |
| Fulham West | Con | 3,483 | 10.1 | 69.9% | Con hold |
| Gainsborough | Con | 1,757 | 6.2 | 80.4% | Con hold |
| Galloway | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Gateshead | Nat Lib | 2,968 | 5.4 | 74.7% | Nat Lib hold |
| Glamorganshire Aberavon | Lab | unopposed | — | — | Lab hold |
| Glamorganshire Caerphilly | Lab | 17,108 | 52.5 | 72.3% | Lab hold |
| Glamorganshire Gower | Lab | 13,393 | 33.6 | 76.1% | Lab hold |
| Glamorganshire Llandaff and Barry | Con | 1,422 | 2.5 | 77.0% | Con hold |
| Glamorganshire Neath | Lab | unopposed | — | — | Lab hold |
| Glamorganshire Ogmore | Lab | unopposed | — | — | Lab hold |
| Glamorganshire Pontypridd | Lab | unopposed | — | — | Lab hold |
| Glasgow Bridgeton | ILP | 8,740 | 32.1 | 72.6% | ILP hold |
| Glasgow Camlachie | ILP | 884 | 2.8 | 74.8% | ILP gain from Con |
| Glasgow Cathcart | Con | 8,336 | 24.3 | 74.3% | Con hold |
| Glasgow Central | Con | 3,521 | 11.8 | 67.2% | Con hold |
| Glasgow Gorbals | ILP | 17,036 | 55.9 | 66.1% | ILP hold |
| Glasgow Govan | Lab | 5,580 | 18.0 | 74.7% | Lab hold |
| Glasgow Hillhead | Con | 9,801 | 36.4 | 73.2% | Con hold |
| Glasgow Kelvingrove | Con | 149 | 0.5 | 72.5% | Con hold |
| Glasgow Maryhill | Lab | 3,971 | 10.1 | 73.3% | Lab gain from Con |
| Glasgow Partick | Con | 2,300 | 8.0 | 78.2% | Con hold |
| Glasgow Pollok | Con | 13,738 | 44.2 | 70.1% | Con hold |
| Glasgow Shettleston | ILP | 4,575 | 13.2 | 74.5% | ILP hold |
| Glasgow Springburn | Lab | 8,427 | 26.2 | 71.1% | Lab gain from Con |
| Glasgow St Rollox | Lab | 6,297 | 23.2 | 67.8% | Lab hold |
| Glasgow Tradeston | Lab | 1,899 | 7.3 | 69.3% | Lab gain from Con |
| Gloucester | Con | 3,879 | 14.1 | 79.0% | Con hold |
| Gloucestershire Cirencester and Tewkesbury | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Gloucestershire Forest of Dean | Lab | 4,431 | 15.2 | 77.3% | Lab gain from Nat Lab |
| Gloucestershire Stroud | Con | 10,149 | 26.4 | 71.0% | Con hold |
| Gloucestershire Thornbury | Con | 4,016 | 9.9 | 71.5% | Con hold |
| Grantham | Con | 6,185 | 16.2 | 74.2% | Con hold |
| Great Yarmouth | Nat Lib | 5,340 | 18.6 | 76.4% | Nat Lib gain from Nat Lab |
| Greenock | Nat Lib | 3,354 | 8.7 | 84.4% | Nat Lib hold |
| Greenwich | Con | 2,090 | 4.9 | 67.9% | Con hold |
| Grimsby | Con | 1,727 | 3.5 | 67.8% | Con hold |
| Hackney Central | Lab | 957 | 3.2 | 60.6% | Lab gain from Con |
| Hackney North | Con | 1,080 | 3.7 | 61.1% | Con hold |
| Hackney South | Lab | 4,954 | 18.6 | 62.0% | Lab gain from Con |
| Halifax | Con | 2,632 | 4.9 | 76.9% | Con hold |
| Hammersmith North | Lab | 1,634 | 5.6 | 65.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Hammersmith South | Con | 6,068 | 24.6 | 60.1% | Con hold |
| Hampshire Aldershot | Con | 11,309 | 46.8 | 58.4% | Con hold |
| Hampshire Basingstoke | Con | 8,232 | 25.7 | 67.4% | Con hold |
| Hampshire Fareham | Con | 21,233 | 50.1 | 61.9% | Con hold |
| Hampshire New Forest and Christchurch | Con | 21,333 | 49.5 | 64.5% | Con hold |
| Hampshire Petersfield | Con | 16,816 | 58.1 | 63.4% | Con hold |
| Hampshire Winchester | Con | 12,767 | 28.9 | 71.1% | Con hold |
| Hampstead | Con | 21,347 | 55.1 | 59.0% | Con hold |
| Hastings | Con | 11,501 | 38.0 | 66.5% | Con hold |
| Herefordshire Hereford | Con | 9,381 | 31.8 | 74.7% | Con hold |
| Herefordshire Leominster | Con | 1,715 | 6.4 | 78.2% | Con hold |
| Hertfordshire Hemel Hempstead | Con | 12,996 | 40.5 | 69.4% | Con hold |
| Hertfordshire Hertford | Con | 9,701 | 29.7 | 62.5% | Con hold |
| Hertfordshire Hitchin | Con | 9,035 | 26.7 | 66.4% | Con hold |
| Hertfordshire St Albans | Con | 17,510 | 35.0 | 62.6% | Con hold |
| Hertfordshire Watford | Con | 13,290 | 30.8 | 63.5% | Con hold |
| Holborn | Con | 7,329 | 45.9 | 49.0% | Con hold |
| Holland With Boston | Nat Lib | 11,898 | 31.0 | 63.6% | Nat Lib hold |
| Horncastle | Con | 9,612 | 37.6 | 69.4% | Con hold |
| Hornsey | Con | 20,174 | 42.9 | 67.0% | Con hold |
| Huddersfield | Nat Lib | 13,165 | 21.6 | 73.2% | Nat Lib gain from Nat Lab |
| Huntingdonshire | Nat Lib | 9,426 | 37.5 | 66.2% | Nat Lib hold |
| Hythe | Con | 6,671 | 27.7 | 68.3% | Con hold |
| Ilford | Con | 17,967 | 26.3 | 64.0% | Con hold |
| Inverness Shire and Ross and Cromarty Inverness | Nat Lib | 7,688 | 29.0 | 57.8% | Nat Lib hold |
| Inverness Shire and Ross and Cromarty Ross and Cromarty | Nat Lib | 7,526 | 53.4 | 50.8% | Nat Lib hold |
| Inverness Shire and Ross and Cromarty Western Isles | Lab | 1,345 | 10.2 | 46.8% | Lab gain from Nat Lib |
| Ipswich | Con | 7,250 | 14.6 | 82.1% | Con hold |
| Isle of Ely | Lib | 699 | 2.0 | 66.0% | Lib hold |
| Isle of Wight | Con | 11,162 | 26.4 | 69.4% | Con hold |
| Islington East | Con | 4,438 | 12.8 | 57.8% | Con hold |
| Islington North | Con | 3,385 | 8.9 | 59.7% | Con hold |
| Islington South | Lab | 1,128 | 4.7 | 56.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Islington West | Lab | 2,060 | 10.0 | 52.6% | Lab gain from Con |
| Kensington North | Con | 3,598 | 10.1 | 60.6% | Con hold |
| Kensington South | Con | 33,518 | 77.8 | 62.0% | Con hold |
| Kent Ashford | Con | 12,985 | 36.1 | 73.6% | Con hold |
| Kent Canterbury | Con | 17,388 | 48.7 | 64.4% | Con hold |
| Kent Chislehurst | Con | 26,478 | 47.1 | 66.1% | Con hold |
| Kent Dartford | Con | 2,646 | 3.6 | 69.6% | Con hold |
| Kent Dover | Con | 11,296 | 27.9 | 69.6% | Con hold |
| Kent Faversham | Con | 3,821 | 9.1 | 74.0% | Con hold |
| Kent Gravesend | Con | 4,444 | 12.2 | 72.4% | Con hold |
| Kent Isle of Thanet | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Kent Maidstone | Con | 15,304 | 45.0 | 67.5% | Con hold |
| Kent Sevenoaks | Con | 11,108 | 35.0 | 65.3% | Con hold |
| Kent Tonbridge | Con | 14,055 | 36.7 | 68.2% | Con hold |
| Kettering | Con | 1,843 | 4.2 | 77.3% | Con hold |
| Kingston upon Hull Central | Lab | 1,619 | 5.8 | 72.2% | Lab gain from Con |
| Kingston upon Hull East | Lab | 3,606 | 9.3 | 75.6% | Lab gain from Con |
| Kingston upon Hull North West | Con | 5,234 | 15.7 | 72.0% | Con hold |
| Kingston upon Hull South West | Con | 3,431 | 10.1 | 68.8% | Con hold |
| Kingston upon Thames | Con | 22,939 | 47.0 | 65.5% | Con hold |
| Kirkcaldy District of Burghs | Lab | 4,371 | 12.7 | 79.9% | Lab gain from Con |
| Lambeth Brixton | Con | 6,506 | 21.5 | 58.5% | Con hold |
| Lambeth Kennington | Con | 545 | 2.3 | 55.7% | Con hold |
| Lambeth North | Lab | 2,056 | 10.8 | 54.2% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Lambeth Norwood | Con | 12,456 | 33.8 | 62.2% | Con hold |
| Lanarkshire Bothwell | Lab | 7,139 | 20.6 | 78.6% | Lab gain from Con |
| Lanarkshire Coatbridge | Lab | 4,414 | 14.4 | 78.5% | Lab gain from Con |
| Lanarkshire Hamilton | Lab | 8,165 | 31.5 | 74.0% | Lab hold |
| Lanarkshire Lanark | Con | 6,809 | 21.8 | 76.0% | Con hold |
| Lanarkshire Motherwell | Lab | 430 | 1.5 | 75.9% | Lab gain from Con |
| Lanarkshire Northern | Con | 5,034 | 10.9 | 78.1% | Con hold |
| Lanarkshire Rutherglen | Con | 581 | 1.4 | 80.0% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Chorley | Con | 5,775 | 13.8 | 78.4% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Clitheroe | Con | 3,752 | 9.7 | 87.7% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Darwen | Con | 1,157 | 3.1 | 89.9% | Con gain from Lib |
| Lancashire Farnworth | Lab | 5,201 | 12.2 | 82.4% | Lab gain from Con |
| Lancashire Fylde | Con | 23,352 | 41.6 | 72.0% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Heywood and Radcliffe | Con | 9,427 | 20.9 | 78.2% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Ince | Lab | 16,406 | 45.2 | 77.3% | Lab hold |
| Lancashire Lancaster | Con | 13,578 | 27.4 | 79.0% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Lonsdale | Con | 9,392 | 32.8 | 79.3% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Middleton and Prestwich | Con | 9,971 | 22.3 | 74.5% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Mossley | Con | 2,170 | 4.6 | 75.3% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Newton | Lab | 5,791 | 16.9 | 84.8% | Lab gain from Con |
| Lancashire Ormskirk | Nat Lab | 8,045 | 17.0 | 65.8% | Nat Lab hold |
| Lancashire Royton | Con | 10,600 | 27.0 | 81.7% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Stretford | Con | 15,596 | 28.8 | 72.5% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Waterloo | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Lancashire West Houghton | Lab | 7,242 | 20.7 | 83.2% | Lab hold |
| Lancashire Widnes | Con | 5,270 | 12.1 | 80.1% | Con hold |
| Leeds Central | Nat Lab | 4,046 | 12.9 | 61.4% | Nat Lab hold |
| Leeds North | Con | 16,844 | 37.9 | 66.8% | Con hold |
| Leeds North East | Con | 11,835 | 29.6 | 66.1% | Con hold |
| Leeds South | Lab | 1,016 | 3.1 | 73.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Leeds South East | Lab | 9,360 | 31.5 | 62.5% | Lab hold |
| Leeds West | Con | 3,234 | 8.5 | 70.5% | Con hold |
| Leicester East | Con | 2,910 | 7.0 | 70.2% | Con hold |
| Leicester South | Con | 11,473 | 30.0 | 70.2% | Con hold |
| Leicester West | Nat Lab | 87 | 0.2 | 66.8% | Nat Lab gain from Lib |
| Leicestershire Bosworth | Nat Lib | 7,153 | 18.4 | 73.3% | Nat Lib hold |
| Leicestershire Harborough | Con | 10,590 | 26.5 | 72.3% | Con hold |
| Leicestershire Loughborough | Con | 743 | 2.1 | 77.4% | Con hold |
| Leicestershire Melton | Con | 13,601 | 34.8 | 71.9% | Con hold |
| Leigh | Lab | unopposed | — | — | Lab hold |
| Leith | Nat Lib | 5,069 | 15.5 | 65.5% | Nat Lib hold |
| Lewisham East | Con | 6,449 | 10.9 | 68.0% | Con hold |
| Lewisham West | Con | 12,370 | 29.5 | 63.9% | Con hold |
| Leyton East | Con | 329 | 1.4 | 67.1% | Con hold |
| Leyton West | Lab | 128 | 0.4 | 68.0% | Lab gain from Con |
| Lincoln | Con | 2,684 | 8.1 | 84.0% | Con hold |
| Linlithgowshire | Lab | 3,175 | 8.2 | 80.8% | Lab gain from Con |
| Liverpool East Toxteth | Con | 7,016 | 20.5 | 65.2% | Con hold |
| Liverpool Edge Hill | Con | 301 | 1.1 | 68.1% | Con hold |
| Liverpool Everton | Lab | 177 | 0.8 | 67.4% | Lab gain from Con |
| Liverpool Exchange | Con | 4,412 | 14.5 | 65.7% | Con hold |
| Liverpool Fairfield | Con | 7,441 | 25.0 | 61.7% | Con hold |
| Liverpool Kirkdale | Con | 556 | 2.0 | 69.5% | Con hold |
| Liverpool Scotland | Lab | 7,664 | 31.4 | 64.1% | Lab hold |
| Liverpool Walton | Con | 8,544 | 23.3 | 64.2% | Con hold |
| Liverpool Wavertree | Con | 7,847 | 17.1 | 73.2% | Con hold |
| Liverpool West Derby | Con | 10,978 | 30.2 | 62.6% | Con hold |
| Liverpool West Toxteth | Lab | 2,004 | 5.7 | 78.6% | Lab gain from Con |
| London University | Oth | 5,040 | 39.1 | 71.7% | Oth hold |
| Londonderry | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Louth | Con | 7,444 | 23.3 | 71.9% | Con hold |
| Manchester Ardwick | Lab | 1,808 | 5.9 | 71.4% | Lab gain from Con |
| Manchester Blackley | Con | 5,462 | 15.8 | 78.1% | Con hold |
| Manchester Clayton | Lab | 2,668 | 7.5 | 77.0% | Lab gain from Con |
| Manchester Exchange | Con | 7,643 | 25.9 | 63.3% | Con hold |
| Manchester Gorton | Lab | 4,206 | 11.7 | 77.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Manchester Hulme | Con | 5,851 | 20.7 | 66.7% | Con hold |
| Manchester Moss Side | Con | 4,505 | 17.4 | 63.2% | Con hold |
| Manchester Platting | Lab | 1,337 | 3.8 | 76.5% | Lab gain from Con |
| Manchester Rusholme | Con | 10,420 | 33.1 | 69.8% | Con hold |
| Manchester Withington | Con | 23,316 | 40.8 | 70.9% | Con hold |
| Merionethshire | Lib | 1,149 | 4.9 | 81.6% | Lib hold |
| Merthyr Tydfil Aberdare | Lab | unopposed | — | — | Lab hold |
| Merthyr Tydfil Merthyr | Lab | 10,890 | 36.1 | 68.8% | Lab gain from ILP |
| Middlesbrough East | Lab | 67 | 0.2 | 81.1% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Middlesbrough West | Lib | 925 | 2.4 | 79.4% | Lib hold |
| Middlesex Acton | Con | 5,578 | 17.1 | 67.8% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Brentford and Chiswick | Con | 8,272 | 30.8 | 64.2% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Enfield | Con | 5,503 | 12.9 | 73.3% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Finchley | Con | 18,040 | 42.5 | 70.3% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Harrow | Con | 21,307 | 25.3 | 64.4% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Hendon | Con | 41,387 | 39.0 | 64.4% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Spelthorne | Con | 16,196 | 36.7 | 58.0% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Twickenham | Con | 14,812 | 24.5 | 66.5% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Uxbridge | Con | 10,727 | 16.7 | 65.2% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Wood Green | Con | 21,823 | 37.2 | 69.1% | Con hold |
| Midlothian and Peeblesshire Northern | Con | 9,741 | 25.9 | 74.3% | Con hold |
| Midlothian and Peeblesshire Peebles and Southern | Con | 1,462 | 5.7 | 74.9% | Con hold |
| Monmouthshire Abertillery | Lab | unopposed | — | — | Lab hold |
| Monmouthshire Bedwellty | Lab | unopposed | — | — | Lab hold |
| Monmouthshire Ebbw Vale | Lab | 17,862 | 55.6 | 82.6% | Lab hold |
| Monmouthshire Monmouth | Con | 9,808 | 26.7 | 76.8% | Con hold |
| Monmouthshire Pontypool | Lab | 11,791 | 35.8 | 78.5% | Lab hold |
| Montgomeryshire | Nat Lib | unopposed | — | — | Nat Lib hold |
| Montrose District of Burghs | Nat Lib | 8,566 | 39.2 | 70.6% | Nat Lib hold |
| Moray and Nairnshire | Con | 5,408 | 26.9 | 65.9% | Con hold |
| Morpeth | Lab | 8,956 | 18.3 | 78.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Nelson and Colne | Lab | 4,315 | 9.0 | 84.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Newcastle under Lyme | Lab | unopposed | — | — | Lab hold |
| Newcastle upon Tyne Central | Con | 4,955 | 18.6 | 75.5% | Con hold |
| Newcastle upon Tyne East | Nat Lib | 6,824 | 17.3 | 81.3% | Nat Lib hold |
| Newcastle upon Tyne North | Con | 17,990 | 53.9 | 70.3% | Con hold |
| Newcastle upon Tyne West | Con | 8,474 | 19.9 | 75.1% | Con hold |
| Newport | Con | 1,545 | 3.4 | 79.4% | Con hold |
| Norfolk Eastern | Nat Lib | 12,647 | 37.7 | 66.8% | Nat Lib hold |
| Norfolk King'S Lynn | Con | 5,430 | 15.5 | 71.7% | Con hold |
| Norfolk Northern | Con | 3,398 | 10.5 | 78.1% | Con hold |
| Norfolk South Western | Con | 4,117 | 14.7 | 69.5% | Con hold |
| Norfolk Southern | Con | 5,011 | 15.7 | 73.5% | Con hold |
| Northampton | Con | 1,455 | 2.9 | 79.6% | Con hold |
| Northumberland Berwick upon Tweed | Lib | 634 | 2.1 | 76.0% | Lib gain from Con |
| Northumberland Hexham | Con | 6,917 | 25.1 | 75.9% | Con hold |
| Northumberland Wansbeck | Con | 955 | 1.6 | 79.6% | Con hold |
| Norwich | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 75.7% | |
| Nottingham Central | Con | 8,513 | 29.5 | 68.9% | Con hold |
| Nottingham East | Con | 9,291 | 32.1 | 68.1% | Con hold |
| Nottingham South | Nat Lab | 4,596 | 15.4 | 71.0% | Nat Lab hold |
| Nottingham West | Lab | 2,710 | 7.4 | 71.4% | Lab gain from Con |
| Nottinghamshire Bassetlaw | Lab | 1,139 | 2.7 | 79.9% | Lab gain from Nat Lab |
| Nottinghamshire Broxtowe | Lab | 11,050 | 25.9 | 73.5% | Lab hold |
| Nottinghamshire Mansfield | Lab | 16,841 | 36.0 | 69.5% | Lab hold |
| Nottinghamshire Newark | Con | 8,666 | 24.8 | 69.9% | Con hold |
| Nottinghamshire Rushcliffe | Con | 12,971 | 25.1 | 67.9% | Con hold |
| Oldham | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 79.2% | |
| Orkney and Shetland | Con | 2,226 | 15.3 | 46.3% | Con gain from Lib |
| Oxford | Con | 6,645 | 25.6 | 67.3% | Con hold |
| Oxford University | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 68.0% | |
| Oxfordshire Banbury | Con | 10,448 | 31.3 | 65.8% | Con hold |
| Oxfordshire Henley | Con | 12,770 | 40.8 | 56.9% | Con hold |
| Paddington North | Con | 7,228 | 25.0 | 60.3% | Con hold |
| Paddington South | Con | 15,622 | 57.7 | 55.7% | Con hold |
| Paisley | Lib | 389 | 0.9 | 80.3% | Lib hold |
| Pembrokeshire | Lib | 1,074 | 2.4 | 79.1% | Lib hold |
| Perthshire and Kinross Shire Kinross and Western | Con | 5,169 | 20.4 | 73.9% | Con hold |
| Perthshire and Kinross Shire Perth | Con | 14,802 | 47.4 | 64.0% | Con hold |
| Peterborough | Con | 5,304 | 13.2 | 80.8% | Con hold |
| Plymouth Devonport | Nat Lib | 11,096 | 36.3 | 72.3% | Nat Lib hold |
| Plymouth Drake | Con | 6,078 | 16.5 | 74.8% | Con hold |
| Plymouth Sutton | Con | 6,097 | 16.5 | 77.6% | Con hold |
| Poplar Bow and Bromley | Lab | 13,357 | 53.9 | 59.5% | Lab hold |
| Poplar South Poplar | Lab | 11,853 | 46.3 | 55.3% | Lab hold |
| Portsmouth Central | Con | 10,845 | 30.2 | 71.1% | Con hold |
| Portsmouth North | Con | 11,454 | 33.2 | 64.9% | Con hold |
| Portsmouth South | Con | 18,373 | 50.4 | 66.9% | Con hold |
| Preston | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 82.6% | |
| Queen'S University of Belfast | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Reading | Con | 4,591 | 8.6 | 79.2% | Con hold |
| Renfrewshire Eastern | Con | 13,646 | 21.6 | 75.9% | Con hold |
| Renfrewshire Western | Con | 3,499 | 11.0 | 81.0% | Con hold |
| Rhondda East | Lab | 8,433 | 23.6 | 80.8% | Lab hold |
| Rhondda West | Lab | unopposed | — | — | Lab hold |
| Richmond (Surrey) | Con | 19,480 | 47.1 | 69.8% | Con hold |
| Rochdale | Lab | 1,795 | 3.3 | 84.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Rochester Chatham | Con | 5,897 | 18.1 | 74.6% | Con hold |
| Rochester Gillingham | Con | 8,694 | 30.2 | 71.4% | Con hold |
| Rossendale | Con | 881 | 2.2 | 86.1% | Con hold |
| Rotherham | Lab | 15,427 | 35.0 | 76.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Roxburghshire and Selkirkshire | Con | 6,078 | 16.6 | 78.0% | Con hold |
| Rutland and Stamford | Con | 5,561 | 19.8 | 78.4% | Con hold |
| Salford North | Con | 4,632 | 13.2 | 74.0% | Con hold |
| Salford South | Con | 304 | 1.0 | 73.4% | Con hold |
| Salford West | Con | 4,513 | 12.4 | 79.6% | Con hold |
| Sheffield Attercliffe | Lab | 7,629 | 25.7 | 73.0% | Lab gain from Con |
| Sheffield Brightside | Lab | 5,518 | 17.0 | 68.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Sheffield Central | Con | 420 | 1.5 | 74.2% | Con hold |
| Sheffield Ecclesall | Con | 14,646 | 47.3 | 71.0% | Con hold |
| Sheffield Hallam | Con | 10,952 | 34.6 | 71.7% | Con hold |
| Sheffield Hillsborough | Lab | 3,304 | 8.5 | 76.8% | Lab gain from Con |
| Sheffield Park | Lab | 1,206 | 2.9 | 73.2% | Lab gain from Con |
| Shoreditch | Lab | 6,929 | 22.9 | 51.9% | Lab gain from Nat Lib |
| Shropshire Ludlow | Con | 10,204 | 45.3 | 67.9% | Con hold |
| Shropshire Oswestry | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Shropshire Shrewsbury | Con | 8,795 | 31.4 | 74.2% | Con hold |
| Shropshire the Wrekin | Con | 5,625 | 15.8 | 79.1% | Con hold |
| Smethwick | Con | 1,552 | 4.9 | 70.7% | Con hold |
| Somerset Bridgwater | Con | 10,569 | 33.5 | 72.7% | Con hold |
| Somerset Frome | Con | 994 | 2.3 | 82.5% | Con hold |
| Somerset Taunton | Con | 8,224 | 26.8 | 72.3% | Con hold |
| Somerset Wells | Con | 7,621 | 27.3 | 73.7% | Con hold |
| Somersetshire Weston Super Mare | Con | 19,852 | 47.0 | 66.4% | Con hold |
| Somersetshire Yeovil | Con | 5,158 | 13.7 | 77.8% | Con hold |
| South Shields | Lab | 9,099 | 19.9 | 72.8% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Southampton | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | — | |
| Southend on Sea | Con | 24,931 | 44.1 | 66.0% | Con hold |
| Southport | Con | 18,233 | 44.4 | 70.9% | Con hold |
| Southwark Central | Lab | 1,363 | 6.5 | 57.2% | Lab gain from Nat |
| Southwark North | Nat Lib | 79 | 0.5 | 56.1% | Nat Lib gain from Nat Lab |
| Southwark South East | Lab | 4,997 | 26.5 | 53.3% | Lab gain from Con |
| St Helens | Lab | 3,981 | 7.4 | 82.6% | Lab gain from Con |
| St Marylebone | Con | 23,175 | 59.1 | 57.9% | Con hold |
| St Pancras North | Con | 3,601 | 11.5 | 68.3% | Con hold |
| St Pancras South East | Con | 1,636 | 7.0 | 60.4% | Con hold |
| St Pancras South West | Con | 2,365 | 10.0 | 59.4% | Con hold |
| Staffordshire Burton | Con | 15,498 | 49.1 | 65.6% | Con hold |
| Staffordshire Cannock | Lab | 1,046 | 1.9 | 71.4% | Lab gain from Con |
| Staffordshire Kingswinford | Lab | 16 | 0.0 | 71.5% | Lab gain from Con |
| Staffordshire Leek | Lab | 6,013 | 14.7 | 75.1% | Lab gain from Con |
| Staffordshire Lichfield | Nat Lab | 3,298 | 7.6 | 64.2% | Nat Lab hold |
| Staffordshire Stafford | Con | 3,661 | 12.8 | 79.0% | Con hold |
| Staffordshire Stone | Con | 7,399 | 22.0 | 66.3% | Con hold |
| Stepney Limehouse | Lab | 7,245 | 33.0 | 59.3% | Lab hold |
| Stepney Mile End | Lab | 3,318 | 14.4 | 63.5% | Lab gain from Con |
| Stepney Whitechapel and St George'S | Lab | 2,281 | 9.3 | 63.3% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Stirling and Falkirk District of Burghs | Lab | 871 | 2.5 | 78.4% | Lab gain from Con |
| Stirlingshire and Clackmannanshire Clackmannan and Eastern | Lab | 1,143 | 3.2 | 76.3% | Lab gain from Con |
| Stirlingshire and Clackmannanshire Western | Lab | 2,962 | 10.2 | 82.3% | Lab gain from Con |
| Stockport | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 79.5% | |
| Stockton on Tees | Con | 4,068 | 8.5 | 86.3% | Con hold |
| Stoke Newington | Con | 3,765 | 17.9 | 61.5% | Con hold |
| Stoke on Trent Burslem | Lab | 2,803 | 8.4 | 77.9% | Lab gain from Nat |
| Stoke on Trent Hanley | Lab | 1,331 | 4.0 | 69.8% | Lab gain from Con |
| Stoke on Trent Stoke | Lab | 2,125 | 5.3 | 70.0% | Lab gain from Con |
| Suffolk (East) Eye | Nat Lib | 13,993 | 47.9 | 70.7% | |
| Suffolk (East) Lowestoft | Con | 7,716 | 22.4 | 69.0% | Con hold |
| Suffolk (East) Woodbridge | Con | 13,907 | 44.1 | 67.5% | Con hold |
| Suffolk (West) Bury St Edmunds | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Suffolk (West) Sudbury | Con | 3,356 | 14.2 | 72.8% | Con hold |
| Sunderland | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 79.0% | |
| Surrey Chertsey | Con | 18,877 | 42.8 | 60.2% | Con hold |
| Surrey Eastern | Con | 24,751 | 57.8 | 66.5% | Con hold |
| Surrey Epsom | Con | 30,662 | 44.3 | 65.4% | Con hold |
| Surrey Farnham | Con | 20,486 | 57.0 | 59.8% | Con hold |
| Surrey Guildford | Con | 23,551 | 49.9 | 69.3% | Con hold |
| Surrey Mitcham | Con | 9,152 | 14.9 | 66.7% | Con hold |
| Surrey Reigate | Con | 19,592 | 47.7 | 69.9% | Con hold |
| Sussex (East) East Grinstead | Con | 21,343 | 56.9 | 61.2% | Con hold |
| Sussex (East) Eastbourne | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Sussex (East) Lewes | Con | 14,085 | 40.0 | 64.4% | Con hold |
| Sussex (East) Rye | Con | 13,442 | 42.3 | 64.2% | Con hold |
| Sussex (West) Chichester | Con | 27,398 | 56.7 | 59.5% | Con hold |
| Sussex (West) Horsham and Worthing | Con | 29,012 | 53.8 | 60.3% | Con hold |
| Swansea East | Lab | unopposed | — | — | Lab hold |
| Swansea West | Nat Lib | 2,081 | 5.9 | 80.0% | Nat Lib hold |
| The Hartlepools | Con | 4,897 | 10.7 | 83.0% | Con hold |
| Tottenham North | Lab | 8,009 | 21.7 | 65.9% | Lab gain from Con |
| Tottenham South | Lab | 4,613 | 17.1 | 60.5% | Lab gain from Nat Lab |
| Tynemouth | Con | 5,858 | 17.2 | 79.2% | Con hold |
| University of Wales | Lib | 1,028 | 22.5 | 62.3% | Lib hold |
| Wakefield | Lab | 3,404 | 12.1 | 84.9% | Lab gain from Con |
| Wallasey | Con | 14,458 | 34.9 | 66.1% | Con hold |
| Wallsend | Con | 2,379 | 5.3 | 81.3% | Con hold |
| Walsall | Nat Lib | 8,969 | 18.1 | 75.3% | Nat Lib gain from Nat |
| Walthamstow East | Con | 2,488 | 8.0 | 69.0% | Con hold |
| Walthamstow West | Lab | 6,739 | 23.7 | 65.0% | Lab hold |
| Wandsworth Balham and Tooting | Con | 9,053 | 25.9 | 61.8% | Con hold |
| Wandsworth Central | Con | 4,323 | 17.2 | 65.0% | Con hold |
| Wandsworth Clapham | Con | 6,090 | 21.1 | 60.5% | Con hold |
| Wandsworth Putney | Con | 11,393 | 33.3 | 68.5% | Con hold |
| Wandsworth Streatham | Con | 17,478 | 52.4 | 64.1% | Con hold |
| Warrington | Con | 604 | 1.4 | 84.8% | Con hold |
| Warwickshire Nuneaton | Lab | 5,237 | 7.6 | 75.9% | Lab gain from Con |
| Warwickshire Rugby | Con | 7,844 | 23.1 | 73.8% | Con hold |
| Warwickshire Tamworth | Con | 31,649 | 58.9 | 64.6% | Con hold |
| Warwickshire Warwick and Leamington | Con | 24,816 | 53.2 | 65.7% | Con hold |
| Wednesbury | Lab | 2,800 | 6.6 | 78.1% | Lab gain from Con |
| Wellingborough | Con | 372 | 1.0 | 77.3% | Con hold |
| West Bromwich | Lab | 938 | 2.5 | 74.8% | Lab gain from Con |
| West Ham Plaistow | Lab | 11,763 | 46.6 | 53.1% | Lab hold |
| West Ham Silvertown | Lab | 13,901 | 61.9 | 53.4% | Lab hold |
| West Ham Stratford | Lab | 5,975 | 26.1 | 57.1% | Lab hold |
| West Ham Upton | Lab | 1,665 | 6.5 | 62.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Westminster Abbey | Con | 12,862 | 55.0 | 49.2% | Con hold |
| Westminster St George'S | Con | 20,781 | 69.1 | 55.2% | Con hold |
| Westmorland | Con | 12,217 | 37.0 | 73.8% | Con hold |
| Wigan | Lab | 10,304 | 22.6 | 81.7% | Lab hold |
| Willesden East | Con | 10,090 | 22.8 | 62.0% | Con hold |
| Willesden West | Lab | 2,930 | 8.2 | 64.3% | Lab gain from Con |
| Wiltshire Chippenham | Con | 5,421 | 18.8 | 77.5% | Con hold |
| Wiltshire Devizes | Con | 4,535 | 18.6 | 72.2% | Con hold |
| Wiltshire Salisbury | Con | 12,448 | 43.0 | 66.2% | Con hold |
| Wiltshire Swindon | Con | 975 | 2.4 | 84.3% | Con hold |
| Wiltshire Westbury | Con | 5,015 | 15.6 | 80.1% | Con hold |
| Wimbledon | Con | 19,364 | 35.7 | 67.6% | Con hold |
| Wolverhampton Bilston | Con | 869 | 2.4 | 70.9% | Con hold |
| Wolverhampton East | Lib | 4,000 | 12.2 | 73.3% | Lib hold |
| Wolverhampton West | Con | 4,830 | 13.5 | 72.4% | Con hold |
| Woolwich East | Lab | 4,842 | 16.0 | 71.3% | Lab hold |
| Woolwich West | Con | 7,276 | 17.3 | 75.8% | Con hold |
| Worcester | Con | 6,513 | 24.6 | 76.8% | Con hold |
| Worcestershire Bewdley | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Worcestershire Evesham | Con | 12,493 | 43.4 | 66.4% | Con hold |
| Worcestershire Kidderminster | Con | 16,009 | 39.1 | 60.2% | Con hold |
| Worcestershire Stourbridge | Con | 5,301 | 9.3 | 70.9% | Con hold |
| York | Con | 6,274 | 14.1 | 82.5% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (East Riding) Buckrose | Con | 3,327 | 10.1 | 78.4% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (East Riding) Holderness | Con | 11,901 | 28.7 | 72.2% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (East Riding) Howdenshire | Con | 10,318 | 36.3 | 69.2% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (North Riding) Cleveland | Con | 2,732 | 5.4 | 81.2% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (North Riding) Richmond | Con | 17,719 | 54.6 | 68.1% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (North Riding) Scarborough and Whitby | Con | 6,542 | 15.2 | 74.7% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (North Riding) Thirsk and Malton | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Barkston Ash | Con | 9,189 | 21.8 | 78.5% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Colne Valley | Lab | 3,779 | 8.9 | 76.0% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Don Valley | Lab | 18,259 | 37.9 | 70.0% | Lab hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Doncaster | Lab | 7,952 | 15.3 | 77.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Elland | Con | 1,642 | 4.4 | 77.2% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Hemsworth | Lab | 21,266 | 60.2 | 72.3% | Lab hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Keighley | Lab | 368 | 0.9 | 78.9% | Lab gain from Con |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Normanton | Lab | 20,599 | 62.8 | 77.7% | Lab hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Penistone | Lab | 3,086 | 6.9 | 73.3% | Lab gain from Con |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Pontefract | Lab | 2,526 | 6.8 | 75.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Pudsey and Otley | Con | 11,425 | 26.7 | 76.0% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Ripon | Con | 21,688 | 54.3 | 68.6% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Rother Valley | Lab | 20,364 | 44.1 | 73.8% | Lab hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Rothwell | Lab | 14,120 | 28.9 | 75.4% | Lab hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Shipley | Lab | 4,507 | 10.1 | 77.5% | Lab gain from Con |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Skipton | Con | 5,059 | 12.5 | 79.6% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Sowerby | Con | 2,672 | 7.7 | 75.9% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Spen Valley | Nat Lib | 642 | 1.5 | 77.1% | Nat Lib hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Wentworth | Lab | 29,304 | 64.2 | 73.4% | Lab hold |
Source: commonslibrary.parliament.uk / cbp-8647
Questions and answers
Who won the 1935 general election?
The Conservatives won the most seats: 365 of the 582 single-member and unopposed seats the source breaks down by party (33 seats in two-member and university constituencies are not split by party in the source). Stanley Baldwin became (or remained) prime minister: National Government under Stanley Baldwin.
How many seats did each party win in 1935?
Conservative 365; Labour 154; National Liberal 28; Liberal 20; National Labour 7; Others 4 (out of 615 seats; 308 were needed for a majority).
Who won the most votes in 1935?
The Conservatives won the most votes: 10,032,102 (47.7% of the 21,014,523 votes counted).
What was the turnout at the 1935 general election?
Turnout was 71.1% in contested constituencies (valid votes as a share of the electorate).
How many seats changed hands in 1935?
125 seats changed hands compared with the previous general election, where the constituency had the same boundaries.
What was the closest result in 1935?
Staffordshire Kingswinford, where Labour won by 16 votes.
Official results House of Commons Library, General election results from 1918 to 2019. Contains Parliamentary information licensed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0. How we use this data