England: 1935 general election results
How England voted at the 1935 general election: the Conservatives won 315 of 485 seats with 49.4% of the vote. Every constituency result.
| Party | Seats | Change | Votes | Share | Change | Share bar | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | 315 | −67 | 8,669,544 | 49.4% | −8.4 | ||
| Labour | 116 | +87 | 6,761,805 | 38.5% | +8.9 | ||
| National Liberal | 18 | +3 | 634,574 | 3.6% | +0.8 | ||
| Liberal | 11 | −8 | 1,105,497 | 6.3% | +0.3 | ||
| National Labour | 5 | −9 | 266,176 | 1.5% | −0.5 | ||
| Others | 0 | 0 | 92,077 | 0.5% | +0.3 | ||
| 1 other parties and independents | 16,401 | 0.09% | |||||
Change compared with the 1931 general election in England.
Constituencies
Download CSV| Constituency | Winner | Majority | % | Turnout | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accrington | Con | 4,070 | 8.8 | 87.1% | Con hold |
| Ashton under Lyne | Lab | 114 | 0.4 | 81.0% | Lab gain from Con |
| Barnsley | Lab | 7,635 | 17.8 | 82.6% | Lab gain from Nat Lib |
| Barrow in Furness | Con | 217 | 0.6 | 85.4% | Con hold |
| Bath | Con | 12,020 | 32.9 | 74.5% | Con hold |
| Batley and Morley | Lab | 2,828 | 7.2 | 79.3% | Lab gain from Con |
| Battersea North | Lab | 5,203 | 17.4 | 63.5% | Lab gain from Con |
| Battersea South | Con | 5,447 | 14.7 | 66.8% | Con hold |
| Bedfordshire Bedford | Con | 8,872 | 24.6 | 73.1% | Con hold |
| Bedfordshire Luton | Nat Lib | 13,628 | 31.0 | 63.3% | Nat Lib hold |
| Bedfordshire Mid | Con | 4,431 | 13.9 | 76.3% | Con hold |
| Berkshire Abingdon | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Berkshire Newbury | Con | 15,517 | 46.0 | 65.5% | Con hold |
| Berkshire Windsor | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Bermondsey Rotherhithe | Lab | 4,665 | 19.3 | 71.3% | Lab gain from Con |
| Bermondsey West Bermondsey | Lab | 4,929 | 24.3 | 65.8% | Lab hold |
| Bethnal Green North East | Lab | 4,937 | 27.1 | 55.5% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Bethnal Green South West | Lib | 1,066 | 6.3 | 61.7% | Lib hold |
| Birkenhead East | Lib | 6,694 | 19.4 | 74.2% | Lib hold |
| Birkenhead West | Con | 3,753 | 11.9 | 74.7% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Aston | Con | 10,355 | 37.6 | 64.7% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Deritend | Con | 4,781 | 19.1 | 59.6% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Duddeston | Con | 3,262 | 15.5 | 53.7% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Edgbaston | Con | 21,862 | 63.1 | 62.4% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Erdington | Con | 9,959 | 21.0 | 65.5% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Handsworth | Con | 15,225 | 46.1 | 61.7% | Con hold |
| Birmingham King'S Norton | Con | 5,875 | 13.6 | 74.6% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Ladywood | Con | 11,254 | 43.5 | 66.0% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Moseley | Con | 26,342 | 42.9 | 60.7% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Sparkbrook | Con | 9,446 | 36.9 | 57.3% | Con hold |
| Birmingham West Birmingham | Con | 7,371 | 28.7 | 63.6% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Yardley | Con | 6,838 | 15.3 | 65.2% | Con hold |
| Blackburn | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 84.9% | |
| Blackpool | Con | 34,916 | 47.0 | 74.0% | Con hold |
| Bolton | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 76.8% | |
| Bootle | Con | 3,368 | 9.8 | 71.3% | Con hold |
| Bournemouth | Con | 19,366 | 42.2 | 62.6% | Con hold |
| Bradford Central | Lab | 1,156 | 3.7 | 66.0% | Lab gain from Con |
| Bradford East | Con | 2,193 | 6.5 | 73.1% | Con hold |
| Bradford North | Con | 7,103 | 17.8 | 72.4% | Con hold |
| Bradford South | Lib | 6,960 | 16.9 | 70.4% | Lib hold |
| Brigg | Lab | 203 | 0.6 | 74.2% | Lab gain from Con |
| Brighton | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 62.6% | |
| Bristol Central | Con | 1,516 | 5.1 | 72.8% | Con hold |
| Bristol East | Lab | 6,883 | 18.5 | 75.8% | Lab hold |
| Bristol North | Lib | 4,828 | 13.0 | 73.2% | Lib hold |
| Bristol South | Lab | 2,433 | 5.4 | 76.9% | Lab gain from Con |
| Bristol West | Con | 21,762 | 42.0 | 70.8% | Con hold |
| Bromley | Con | 27,941 | 47.4 | 65.1% | Con hold |
| Buckinghamshire Aylesbury | Con | 11,106 | 25.8 | 70.2% | Con hold |
| Buckinghamshire Buckingham | Con | 5,688 | 16.0 | 75.1% | Con hold |
| Buckinghamshire Wycombe | Con | 15,930 | 29.7 | 61.4% | Con hold |
| Burnley | Lab | 4,195 | 7.2 | 87.6% | Lab gain from Nat |
| Bury | Con | 5,580 | 15.0 | 83.3% | Con hold |
| Camberwell Dulwich | Con | 9,728 | 35.1 | 65.8% | Con hold |
| Camberwell North | Lab | 5,777 | 32.0 | 55.6% | Lab gain from Con |
| Camberwell North West | Con | 813 | 3.4 | 59.3% | Con hold |
| Camberwell Peckham | Con | 772 | 2.6 | 64.8% | Con hold |
| Cambridge | Con | 5,491 | 17.0 | 73.2% | Con hold |
| Cambridgeshire | Con | 7,650 | 21.4 | 67.8% | Con hold |
| Carlisle | Con | 2,635 | 7.7 | 88.3% | Con hold |
| Chelsea | Con | 12,644 | 49.9 | 61.7% | Con hold |
| Cheltenham | Con | 10,790 | 40.9 | 70.4% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Altrincham | Con | 29,226 | 40.5 | 72.0% | Con hold |
| Cheshire City of Chester | Con | 6,699 | 20.0 | 77.9% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Crewe | Con | 1,109 | 2.6 | 80.3% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Eddisbury | Nat Lib | unopposed | — | — | Nat Lib hold |
| Cheshire Knutsford | Con | 12,999 | 27.4 | 76.3% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Macclesfield | Con | 9,488 | 20.6 | 78.9% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Northwich | Con | 4,027 | 9.0 | 77.9% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Stalybridge and Hyde | Con | 5,073 | 11.0 | 78.7% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Wirral | Con | 25,816 | 45.0 | 69.7% | Con hold |
| City of London | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Cornwall Bodmin | Con | 2,753 | 7.9 | 82.3% | Con gain from Lib |
| Cornwall Camborne | Con | 6,905 | 22.5 | 66.9% | Con hold |
| Cornwall Northern | Lib | 836 | 2.5 | 79.9% | Lib hold |
| Cornwall Penryn and Falmouth | Con | 3,031 | 7.4 | 77.6% | Con hold |
| Cornwall St Ives | Nat Lib | unopposed | — | — | |
| Coventry | Con | 2,472 | 3.4 | 81.1% | Con hold |
| Croydon North | Con | 18,511 | 34.1 | 64.6% | Con hold |
| Croydon South | Con | 17,071 | 33.3 | 65.2% | Con hold |
| Cumberland Northern | Lib | 894 | 3.7 | 83.9% | Lib gain from Con |
| Cumberland Penrith and Cockermouth | Con | 6,460 | 28.7 | 78.4% | Con hold |
| Cumberland Whitehaven | Lab | 352 | 1.2 | 87.3% | Lab gain from Con |
| Cumberland Workington | Lab | unopposed | — | — | Lab hold |
| Darlington | Con | 4,215 | 10.4 | 84.8% | Con hold |
| Daventry | Con | 8,167 | 27.5 | 76.0% | Con hold |
| Deptford | Lab | 6,892 | 14.6 | 69.3% | Lab gain from Con |
| Derby | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 77.0% | |
| Derbyshire Belper | Con | 828 | 2.1 | 76.8% | Con hold |
| Derbyshire Chesterfield | Lab | 4,884 | 11.6 | 79.8% | Lab gain from Con |
| Derbyshire Clay Cross | Lab | 16,199 | 49.1 | 73.6% | Lab hold |
| Derbyshire High Peak | Con | 9,586 | 27.0 | 72.2% | Con hold |
| Derbyshire Ilkeston | Lab | 10,601 | 28.6 | 81.7% | Lab gain from Nat Lab |
| Derbyshire North Eastern | Lab | 9,580 | 21.6 | 77.9% | Lab gain from Con |
| Derbyshire Southern | Con | 1,859 | 3.1 | 73.5% | Con hold |
| Derbyshire Western | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Devonshire Barnstaple | Lib | 454 | 1.2 | 83.8% | Lib gain from Con |
| Devonshire Honiton | Con | 13,889 | 43.8 | 69.6% | Con hold |
| Devonshire South Molton | Nat Lib | 15,157 | 57.5 | 72.9% | Nat Lib hold |
| Devonshire Tavistock | Con | 4,053 | 12.2 | 77.9% | Con hold |
| Devonshire Tiverton | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Devonshire Torquay | Con | 17,935 | 42.2 | 71.0% | Con hold |
| Devonshire Totnes | Con | 7,176 | 15.5 | 79.2% | Con hold |
| Dewsbury | Lab | 5,268 | 17.7 | 80.8% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Dorset Eastern | Con | 14,171 | 29.7 | 74.4% | Con hold |
| Dorset Northern | Con | 3,184 | 12.2 | 79.7% | Con hold |
| Dorset Southern | Con | 9,057 | 29.7 | 70.1% | Con hold |
| Dorset Western | Con | 2,090 | 8.2 | 77.9% | Con hold |
| Dudley | Con | 2,449 | 9.6 | 75.3% | Con hold |
| Durham Barnard Castle | Lab | 1,320 | 5.7 | 84.2% | Lab gain from Con |
| Durham Bishop Auckland | Lab | 8,086 | 24.6 | 79.2% | Lab gain from Nat Lib |
| Durham Blaydon | Lab | 9,526 | 24.6 | 80.8% | Lab gain from Con |
| Durham Chester Le Street | Lab | 17,210 | 42.0 | 78.2% | Lab hold |
| Durham Consett | Lab | 7,522 | 17.4 | 83.8% | Lab gain from Nat Lab |
| Durham Durham | Lab | 6,607 | 18.1 | 85.2% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Durham Houghton Le Spring | Lab | 7,675 | 14.3 | 82.0% | Lab gain from Con |
| Durham Jarrow | Lab | 2,350 | 6.1 | 80.8% | Lab gain from Con |
| Durham Seaham | Lab | 20,498 | 36.4 | 86.3% | Lab gain from Nat Lab |
| Durham Sedgefield | Lab | 1,771 | 4.5 | 81.4% | Lab gain from Con |
| Durham Spennymoor | Lab | 12,767 | 42.3 | 74.4% | Lab hold |
| Ealing | Con | 18,500 | 48.1 | 69.1% | Con hold |
| East Ham North | Con | 533 | 1.8 | 65.0% | Con hold |
| East Ham South | Lab | 5,956 | 18.7 | 66.6% | Lab gain from Con |
| Eccles | Con | 2,255 | 5.3 | 80.0% | Con hold |
| Edmonton | Lab | 4,127 | 10.4 | 64.5% | Lab gain from Con |
| Essex Chelmsford | Con | 16,624 | 41.6 | 65.4% | Con hold |
| Essex Colchester | Con | 5,876 | 17.3 | 74.6% | Con hold |
| Essex Epping | Con | 20,419 | 34.6 | 67.7% | Con hold |
| Essex Harwich | Nat Lib | 12,546 | 40.6 | 63.9% | Nat Lib hold |
| Essex Maldon | Con | 7,808 | 24.4 | 73.8% | Con hold |
| Essex Romford | Lab | 8,307 | 8.1 | 61.4% | Lab gain from Con |
| Essex Saffron Walden | Con | 10,036 | 34.3 | 69.2% | Con hold |
| Essex South Eastern | Con | 970 | 1.7 | 59.5% | Con hold |
| Exeter | Con | 7,518 | 21.6 | 75.9% | Con hold |
| Finsbury | Lab | 2,808 | 11.7 | 56.2% | Lab gain from Nat Lab |
| Fulham East | Con | 1,054 | 2.9 | 71.9% | Con hold |
| Fulham West | Con | 3,483 | 10.1 | 69.9% | Con hold |
| Gainsborough | Con | 1,757 | 6.2 | 80.4% | Con hold |
| Gateshead | Nat Lib | 2,968 | 5.4 | 74.7% | Nat Lib hold |
| Gloucester | Con | 3,879 | 14.1 | 79.0% | Con hold |
| Gloucestershire Cirencester and Tewkesbury | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Gloucestershire Forest of Dean | Lab | 4,431 | 15.2 | 77.3% | Lab gain from Nat Lab |
| Gloucestershire Stroud | Con | 10,149 | 26.4 | 71.0% | Con hold |
| Gloucestershire Thornbury | Con | 4,016 | 9.9 | 71.5% | Con hold |
| Grantham | Con | 6,185 | 16.2 | 74.2% | Con hold |
| Great Yarmouth | Nat Lib | 5,340 | 18.6 | 76.4% | Nat Lib gain from Nat Lab |
| Greenwich | Con | 2,090 | 4.9 | 67.9% | Con hold |
| Grimsby | Con | 1,727 | 3.5 | 67.8% | Con hold |
| Hackney Central | Lab | 957 | 3.2 | 60.6% | Lab gain from Con |
| Hackney North | Con | 1,080 | 3.7 | 61.1% | Con hold |
| Hackney South | Lab | 4,954 | 18.6 | 62.0% | Lab gain from Con |
| Halifax | Con | 2,632 | 4.9 | 76.9% | Con hold |
| Hammersmith North | Lab | 1,634 | 5.6 | 65.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Hammersmith South | Con | 6,068 | 24.6 | 60.1% | Con hold |
| Hampshire Aldershot | Con | 11,309 | 46.8 | 58.4% | Con hold |
| Hampshire Basingstoke | Con | 8,232 | 25.7 | 67.4% | Con hold |
| Hampshire Fareham | Con | 21,233 | 50.1 | 61.9% | Con hold |
| Hampshire New Forest and Christchurch | Con | 21,333 | 49.5 | 64.5% | Con hold |
| Hampshire Petersfield | Con | 16,816 | 58.1 | 63.4% | Con hold |
| Hampshire Winchester | Con | 12,767 | 28.9 | 71.1% | Con hold |
| Hampstead | Con | 21,347 | 55.1 | 59.0% | Con hold |
| Hastings | Con | 11,501 | 38.0 | 66.5% | Con hold |
| Herefordshire Hereford | Con | 9,381 | 31.8 | 74.7% | Con hold |
| Herefordshire Leominster | Con | 1,715 | 6.4 | 78.2% | Con hold |
| Hertfordshire Hemel Hempstead | Con | 12,996 | 40.5 | 69.4% | Con hold |
| Hertfordshire Hertford | Con | 9,701 | 29.7 | 62.5% | Con hold |
| Hertfordshire Hitchin | Con | 9,035 | 26.7 | 66.4% | Con hold |
| Hertfordshire St Albans | Con | 17,510 | 35.0 | 62.6% | Con hold |
| Hertfordshire Watford | Con | 13,290 | 30.8 | 63.5% | Con hold |
| Holborn | Con | 7,329 | 45.9 | 49.0% | Con hold |
| Holland With Boston | Nat Lib | 11,898 | 31.0 | 63.6% | Nat Lib hold |
| Horncastle | Con | 9,612 | 37.6 | 69.4% | Con hold |
| Hornsey | Con | 20,174 | 42.9 | 67.0% | Con hold |
| Huddersfield | Nat Lib | 13,165 | 21.6 | 73.2% | Nat Lib gain from Nat Lab |
| Huntingdonshire | Nat Lib | 9,426 | 37.5 | 66.2% | Nat Lib hold |
| Hythe | Con | 6,671 | 27.7 | 68.3% | Con hold |
| Ilford | Con | 17,967 | 26.3 | 64.0% | Con hold |
| Ipswich | Con | 7,250 | 14.6 | 82.1% | Con hold |
| Isle of Ely | Lib | 699 | 2.0 | 66.0% | Lib hold |
| Isle of Wight | Con | 11,162 | 26.4 | 69.4% | Con hold |
| Islington East | Con | 4,438 | 12.8 | 57.8% | Con hold |
| Islington North | Con | 3,385 | 8.9 | 59.7% | Con hold |
| Islington South | Lab | 1,128 | 4.7 | 56.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Islington West | Lab | 2,060 | 10.0 | 52.6% | Lab gain from Con |
| Kensington North | Con | 3,598 | 10.1 | 60.6% | Con hold |
| Kensington South | Con | 33,518 | 77.8 | 62.0% | Con hold |
| Kent Ashford | Con | 12,985 | 36.1 | 73.6% | Con hold |
| Kent Canterbury | Con | 17,388 | 48.7 | 64.4% | Con hold |
| Kent Chislehurst | Con | 26,478 | 47.1 | 66.1% | Con hold |
| Kent Dartford | Con | 2,646 | 3.6 | 69.6% | Con hold |
| Kent Dover | Con | 11,296 | 27.9 | 69.6% | Con hold |
| Kent Faversham | Con | 3,821 | 9.1 | 74.0% | Con hold |
| Kent Gravesend | Con | 4,444 | 12.2 | 72.4% | Con hold |
| Kent Isle of Thanet | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Kent Maidstone | Con | 15,304 | 45.0 | 67.5% | Con hold |
| Kent Sevenoaks | Con | 11,108 | 35.0 | 65.3% | Con hold |
| Kent Tonbridge | Con | 14,055 | 36.7 | 68.2% | Con hold |
| Kettering | Con | 1,843 | 4.2 | 77.3% | Con hold |
| Kingston upon Hull Central | Lab | 1,619 | 5.8 | 72.2% | Lab gain from Con |
| Kingston upon Hull East | Lab | 3,606 | 9.3 | 75.6% | Lab gain from Con |
| Kingston upon Hull North West | Con | 5,234 | 15.7 | 72.0% | Con hold |
| Kingston upon Hull South West | Con | 3,431 | 10.1 | 68.8% | Con hold |
| Kingston upon Thames | Con | 22,939 | 47.0 | 65.5% | Con hold |
| Lambeth Brixton | Con | 6,506 | 21.5 | 58.5% | Con hold |
| Lambeth Kennington | Con | 545 | 2.3 | 55.7% | Con hold |
| Lambeth North | Lab | 2,056 | 10.8 | 54.2% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Lambeth Norwood | Con | 12,456 | 33.8 | 62.2% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Chorley | Con | 5,775 | 13.8 | 78.4% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Clitheroe | Con | 3,752 | 9.7 | 87.7% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Darwen | Con | 1,157 | 3.1 | 89.9% | Con gain from Lib |
| Lancashire Farnworth | Lab | 5,201 | 12.2 | 82.4% | Lab gain from Con |
| Lancashire Fylde | Con | 23,352 | 41.6 | 72.0% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Heywood and Radcliffe | Con | 9,427 | 20.9 | 78.2% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Ince | Lab | 16,406 | 45.2 | 77.3% | Lab hold |
| Lancashire Lancaster | Con | 13,578 | 27.4 | 79.0% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Lonsdale | Con | 9,392 | 32.8 | 79.3% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Middleton and Prestwich | Con | 9,971 | 22.3 | 74.5% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Mossley | Con | 2,170 | 4.6 | 75.3% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Newton | Lab | 5,791 | 16.9 | 84.8% | Lab gain from Con |
| Lancashire Ormskirk | Nat Lab | 8,045 | 17.0 | 65.8% | Nat Lab hold |
| Lancashire Royton | Con | 10,600 | 27.0 | 81.7% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Stretford | Con | 15,596 | 28.8 | 72.5% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Waterloo | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Lancashire West Houghton | Lab | 7,242 | 20.7 | 83.2% | Lab hold |
| Lancashire Widnes | Con | 5,270 | 12.1 | 80.1% | Con hold |
| Leeds Central | Nat Lab | 4,046 | 12.9 | 61.4% | Nat Lab hold |
| Leeds North | Con | 16,844 | 37.9 | 66.8% | Con hold |
| Leeds North East | Con | 11,835 | 29.6 | 66.1% | Con hold |
| Leeds South | Lab | 1,016 | 3.1 | 73.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Leeds South East | Lab | 9,360 | 31.5 | 62.5% | Lab hold |
| Leeds West | Con | 3,234 | 8.5 | 70.5% | Con hold |
| Leicester East | Con | 2,910 | 7.0 | 70.2% | Con hold |
| Leicester South | Con | 11,473 | 30.0 | 70.2% | Con hold |
| Leicester West | Nat Lab | 87 | 0.2 | 66.8% | Nat Lab gain from Lib |
| Leicestershire Bosworth | Nat Lib | 7,153 | 18.4 | 73.3% | Nat Lib hold |
| Leicestershire Harborough | Con | 10,590 | 26.5 | 72.3% | Con hold |
| Leicestershire Loughborough | Con | 743 | 2.1 | 77.4% | Con hold |
| Leicestershire Melton | Con | 13,601 | 34.8 | 71.9% | Con hold |
| Leigh | Lab | unopposed | — | — | Lab hold |
| Lewisham East | Con | 6,449 | 10.9 | 68.0% | Con hold |
| Lewisham West | Con | 12,370 | 29.5 | 63.9% | Con hold |
| Leyton East | Con | 329 | 1.4 | 67.1% | Con hold |
| Leyton West | Lab | 128 | 0.4 | 68.0% | Lab gain from Con |
| Lincoln | Con | 2,684 | 8.1 | 84.0% | Con hold |
| Liverpool East Toxteth | Con | 7,016 | 20.5 | 65.2% | Con hold |
| Liverpool Edge Hill | Con | 301 | 1.1 | 68.1% | Con hold |
| Liverpool Everton | Lab | 177 | 0.8 | 67.4% | Lab gain from Con |
| Liverpool Exchange | Con | 4,412 | 14.5 | 65.7% | Con hold |
| Liverpool Fairfield | Con | 7,441 | 25.0 | 61.7% | Con hold |
| Liverpool Kirkdale | Con | 556 | 2.0 | 69.5% | Con hold |
| Liverpool Scotland | Lab | 7,664 | 31.4 | 64.1% | Lab hold |
| Liverpool Walton | Con | 8,544 | 23.3 | 64.2% | Con hold |
| Liverpool Wavertree | Con | 7,847 | 17.1 | 73.2% | Con hold |
| Liverpool West Derby | Con | 10,978 | 30.2 | 62.6% | Con hold |
| Liverpool West Toxteth | Lab | 2,004 | 5.7 | 78.6% | Lab gain from Con |
| Louth | Con | 7,444 | 23.3 | 71.9% | Con hold |
| Manchester Ardwick | Lab | 1,808 | 5.9 | 71.4% | Lab gain from Con |
| Manchester Blackley | Con | 5,462 | 15.8 | 78.1% | Con hold |
| Manchester Clayton | Lab | 2,668 | 7.5 | 77.0% | Lab gain from Con |
| Manchester Exchange | Con | 7,643 | 25.9 | 63.3% | Con hold |
| Manchester Gorton | Lab | 4,206 | 11.7 | 77.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Manchester Hulme | Con | 5,851 | 20.7 | 66.7% | Con hold |
| Manchester Moss Side | Con | 4,505 | 17.4 | 63.2% | Con hold |
| Manchester Platting | Lab | 1,337 | 3.8 | 76.5% | Lab gain from Con |
| Manchester Rusholme | Con | 10,420 | 33.1 | 69.8% | Con hold |
| Manchester Withington | Con | 23,316 | 40.8 | 70.9% | Con hold |
| Middlesbrough East | Lab | 67 | 0.2 | 81.1% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Middlesbrough West | Lib | 925 | 2.4 | 79.4% | Lib hold |
| Middlesex Acton | Con | 5,578 | 17.1 | 67.8% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Brentford and Chiswick | Con | 8,272 | 30.8 | 64.2% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Enfield | Con | 5,503 | 12.9 | 73.3% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Finchley | Con | 18,040 | 42.5 | 70.3% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Harrow | Con | 21,307 | 25.3 | 64.4% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Hendon | Con | 41,387 | 39.0 | 64.4% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Spelthorne | Con | 16,196 | 36.7 | 58.0% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Twickenham | Con | 14,812 | 24.5 | 66.5% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Uxbridge | Con | 10,727 | 16.7 | 65.2% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Wood Green | Con | 21,823 | 37.2 | 69.1% | Con hold |
| Morpeth | Lab | 8,956 | 18.3 | 78.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Nelson and Colne | Lab | 4,315 | 9.0 | 84.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Newcastle under Lyme | Lab | unopposed | — | — | Lab hold |
| Newcastle upon Tyne Central | Con | 4,955 | 18.6 | 75.5% | Con hold |
| Newcastle upon Tyne East | Nat Lib | 6,824 | 17.3 | 81.3% | Nat Lib hold |
| Newcastle upon Tyne North | Con | 17,990 | 53.9 | 70.3% | Con hold |
| Newcastle upon Tyne West | Con | 8,474 | 19.9 | 75.1% | Con hold |
| Norfolk Eastern | Nat Lib | 12,647 | 37.7 | 66.8% | Nat Lib hold |
| Norfolk King'S Lynn | Con | 5,430 | 15.5 | 71.7% | Con hold |
| Norfolk Northern | Con | 3,398 | 10.5 | 78.1% | Con hold |
| Norfolk South Western | Con | 4,117 | 14.7 | 69.5% | Con hold |
| Norfolk Southern | Con | 5,011 | 15.7 | 73.5% | Con hold |
| Northampton | Con | 1,455 | 2.9 | 79.6% | Con hold |
| Northumberland Berwick upon Tweed | Lib | 634 | 2.1 | 76.0% | Lib gain from Con |
| Northumberland Hexham | Con | 6,917 | 25.1 | 75.9% | Con hold |
| Northumberland Wansbeck | Con | 955 | 1.6 | 79.6% | Con hold |
| Norwich | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 75.7% | |
| Nottingham Central | Con | 8,513 | 29.5 | 68.9% | Con hold |
| Nottingham East | Con | 9,291 | 32.1 | 68.1% | Con hold |
| Nottingham South | Nat Lab | 4,596 | 15.4 | 71.0% | Nat Lab hold |
| Nottingham West | Lab | 2,710 | 7.4 | 71.4% | Lab gain from Con |
| Nottinghamshire Bassetlaw | Lab | 1,139 | 2.7 | 79.9% | Lab gain from Nat Lab |
| Nottinghamshire Broxtowe | Lab | 11,050 | 25.9 | 73.5% | Lab hold |
| Nottinghamshire Mansfield | Lab | 16,841 | 36.0 | 69.5% | Lab hold |
| Nottinghamshire Newark | Con | 8,666 | 24.8 | 69.9% | Con hold |
| Nottinghamshire Rushcliffe | Con | 12,971 | 25.1 | 67.9% | Con hold |
| Oldham | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 79.2% | |
| Oxford | Con | 6,645 | 25.6 | 67.3% | Con hold |
| Oxfordshire Banbury | Con | 10,448 | 31.3 | 65.8% | Con hold |
| Oxfordshire Henley | Con | 12,770 | 40.8 | 56.9% | Con hold |
| Paddington North | Con | 7,228 | 25.0 | 60.3% | Con hold |
| Paddington South | Con | 15,622 | 57.7 | 55.7% | Con hold |
| Peterborough | Con | 5,304 | 13.2 | 80.8% | Con hold |
| Plymouth Devonport | Nat Lib | 11,096 | 36.3 | 72.3% | Nat Lib hold |
| Plymouth Drake | Con | 6,078 | 16.5 | 74.8% | Con hold |
| Plymouth Sutton | Con | 6,097 | 16.5 | 77.6% | Con hold |
| Poplar Bow and Bromley | Lab | 13,357 | 53.9 | 59.5% | Lab hold |
| Poplar South Poplar | Lab | 11,853 | 46.3 | 55.3% | Lab hold |
| Portsmouth Central | Con | 10,845 | 30.2 | 71.1% | Con hold |
| Portsmouth North | Con | 11,454 | 33.2 | 64.9% | Con hold |
| Portsmouth South | Con | 18,373 | 50.4 | 66.9% | Con hold |
| Preston | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 82.6% | |
| Reading | Con | 4,591 | 8.6 | 79.2% | Con hold |
| Richmond (Surrey) | Con | 19,480 | 47.1 | 69.8% | Con hold |
| Rochdale | Lab | 1,795 | 3.3 | 84.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Rochester Chatham | Con | 5,897 | 18.1 | 74.6% | Con hold |
| Rochester Gillingham | Con | 8,694 | 30.2 | 71.4% | Con hold |
| Rossendale | Con | 881 | 2.2 | 86.1% | Con hold |
| Rotherham | Lab | 15,427 | 35.0 | 76.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Rutland and Stamford | Con | 5,561 | 19.8 | 78.4% | Con hold |
| Salford North | Con | 4,632 | 13.2 | 74.0% | Con hold |
| Salford South | Con | 304 | 1.0 | 73.4% | Con hold |
| Salford West | Con | 4,513 | 12.4 | 79.6% | Con hold |
| Sheffield Attercliffe | Lab | 7,629 | 25.7 | 73.0% | Lab gain from Con |
| Sheffield Brightside | Lab | 5,518 | 17.0 | 68.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Sheffield Central | Con | 420 | 1.5 | 74.2% | Con hold |
| Sheffield Ecclesall | Con | 14,646 | 47.3 | 71.0% | Con hold |
| Sheffield Hallam | Con | 10,952 | 34.6 | 71.7% | Con hold |
| Sheffield Hillsborough | Lab | 3,304 | 8.5 | 76.8% | Lab gain from Con |
| Sheffield Park | Lab | 1,206 | 2.9 | 73.2% | Lab gain from Con |
| Shoreditch | Lab | 6,929 | 22.9 | 51.9% | Lab gain from Nat Lib |
| Shropshire Ludlow | Con | 10,204 | 45.3 | 67.9% | Con hold |
| Shropshire Oswestry | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Shropshire Shrewsbury | Con | 8,795 | 31.4 | 74.2% | Con hold |
| Shropshire the Wrekin | Con | 5,625 | 15.8 | 79.1% | Con hold |
| Smethwick | Con | 1,552 | 4.9 | 70.7% | Con hold |
| Somerset Bridgwater | Con | 10,569 | 33.5 | 72.7% | Con hold |
| Somerset Frome | Con | 994 | 2.3 | 82.5% | Con hold |
| Somerset Taunton | Con | 8,224 | 26.8 | 72.3% | Con hold |
| Somerset Wells | Con | 7,621 | 27.3 | 73.7% | Con hold |
| Somersetshire Weston Super Mare | Con | 19,852 | 47.0 | 66.4% | Con hold |
| Somersetshire Yeovil | Con | 5,158 | 13.7 | 77.8% | Con hold |
| South Shields | Lab | 9,099 | 19.9 | 72.8% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Southampton | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | — | |
| Southend on Sea | Con | 24,931 | 44.1 | 66.0% | Con hold |
| Southport | Con | 18,233 | 44.4 | 70.9% | Con hold |
| Southwark Central | Lab | 1,363 | 6.5 | 57.2% | Lab gain from Nat |
| Southwark North | Nat Lib | 79 | 0.5 | 56.1% | Nat Lib gain from Nat Lab |
| Southwark South East | Lab | 4,997 | 26.5 | 53.3% | Lab gain from Con |
| St Helens | Lab | 3,981 | 7.4 | 82.6% | Lab gain from Con |
| St Marylebone | Con | 23,175 | 59.1 | 57.9% | Con hold |
| St Pancras North | Con | 3,601 | 11.5 | 68.3% | Con hold |
| St Pancras South East | Con | 1,636 | 7.0 | 60.4% | Con hold |
| St Pancras South West | Con | 2,365 | 10.0 | 59.4% | Con hold |
| Staffordshire Burton | Con | 15,498 | 49.1 | 65.6% | Con hold |
| Staffordshire Cannock | Lab | 1,046 | 1.9 | 71.4% | Lab gain from Con |
| Staffordshire Kingswinford | Lab | 16 | 0.0 | 71.5% | Lab gain from Con |
| Staffordshire Leek | Lab | 6,013 | 14.7 | 75.1% | Lab gain from Con |
| Staffordshire Lichfield | Nat Lab | 3,298 | 7.6 | 64.2% | Nat Lab hold |
| Staffordshire Stafford | Con | 3,661 | 12.8 | 79.0% | Con hold |
| Staffordshire Stone | Con | 7,399 | 22.0 | 66.3% | Con hold |
| Stepney Limehouse | Lab | 7,245 | 33.0 | 59.3% | Lab hold |
| Stepney Mile End | Lab | 3,318 | 14.4 | 63.5% | Lab gain from Con |
| Stepney Whitechapel and St George'S | Lab | 2,281 | 9.3 | 63.3% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Stockport | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 79.5% | |
| Stockton on Tees | Con | 4,068 | 8.5 | 86.3% | Con hold |
| Stoke Newington | Con | 3,765 | 17.9 | 61.5% | Con hold |
| Stoke on Trent Burslem | Lab | 2,803 | 8.4 | 77.9% | Lab gain from Nat |
| Stoke on Trent Hanley | Lab | 1,331 | 4.0 | 69.8% | Lab gain from Con |
| Stoke on Trent Stoke | Lab | 2,125 | 5.3 | 70.0% | Lab gain from Con |
| Suffolk (East) Eye | Nat Lib | 13,993 | 47.9 | 70.7% | |
| Suffolk (East) Lowestoft | Con | 7,716 | 22.4 | 69.0% | Con hold |
| Suffolk (East) Woodbridge | Con | 13,907 | 44.1 | 67.5% | Con hold |
| Suffolk (West) Bury St Edmunds | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Suffolk (West) Sudbury | Con | 3,356 | 14.2 | 72.8% | Con hold |
| Sunderland | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 79.0% | |
| Surrey Chertsey | Con | 18,877 | 42.8 | 60.2% | Con hold |
| Surrey Eastern | Con | 24,751 | 57.8 | 66.5% | Con hold |
| Surrey Epsom | Con | 30,662 | 44.3 | 65.4% | Con hold |
| Surrey Farnham | Con | 20,486 | 57.0 | 59.8% | Con hold |
| Surrey Guildford | Con | 23,551 | 49.9 | 69.3% | Con hold |
| Surrey Mitcham | Con | 9,152 | 14.9 | 66.7% | Con hold |
| Surrey Reigate | Con | 19,592 | 47.7 | 69.9% | Con hold |
| Sussex (East) East Grinstead | Con | 21,343 | 56.9 | 61.2% | Con hold |
| Sussex (East) Eastbourne | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Sussex (East) Lewes | Con | 14,085 | 40.0 | 64.4% | Con hold |
| Sussex (East) Rye | Con | 13,442 | 42.3 | 64.2% | Con hold |
| Sussex (West) Chichester | Con | 27,398 | 56.7 | 59.5% | Con hold |
| Sussex (West) Horsham and Worthing | Con | 29,012 | 53.8 | 60.3% | Con hold |
| The Hartlepools | Con | 4,897 | 10.7 | 83.0% | Con hold |
| Tottenham North | Lab | 8,009 | 21.7 | 65.9% | Lab gain from Con |
| Tottenham South | Lab | 4,613 | 17.1 | 60.5% | Lab gain from Nat Lab |
| Tynemouth | Con | 5,858 | 17.2 | 79.2% | Con hold |
| Wakefield | Lab | 3,404 | 12.1 | 84.9% | Lab gain from Con |
| Wallasey | Con | 14,458 | 34.9 | 66.1% | Con hold |
| Wallsend | Con | 2,379 | 5.3 | 81.3% | Con hold |
| Walsall | Nat Lib | 8,969 | 18.1 | 75.3% | Nat Lib gain from Nat |
| Walthamstow East | Con | 2,488 | 8.0 | 69.0% | Con hold |
| Walthamstow West | Lab | 6,739 | 23.7 | 65.0% | Lab hold |
| Wandsworth Balham and Tooting | Con | 9,053 | 25.9 | 61.8% | Con hold |
| Wandsworth Central | Con | 4,323 | 17.2 | 65.0% | Con hold |
| Wandsworth Clapham | Con | 6,090 | 21.1 | 60.5% | Con hold |
| Wandsworth Putney | Con | 11,393 | 33.3 | 68.5% | Con hold |
| Wandsworth Streatham | Con | 17,478 | 52.4 | 64.1% | Con hold |
| Warrington | Con | 604 | 1.4 | 84.8% | Con hold |
| Warwickshire Nuneaton | Lab | 5,237 | 7.6 | 75.9% | Lab gain from Con |
| Warwickshire Rugby | Con | 7,844 | 23.1 | 73.8% | Con hold |
| Warwickshire Tamworth | Con | 31,649 | 58.9 | 64.6% | Con hold |
| Warwickshire Warwick and Leamington | Con | 24,816 | 53.2 | 65.7% | Con hold |
| Wednesbury | Lab | 2,800 | 6.6 | 78.1% | Lab gain from Con |
| Wellingborough | Con | 372 | 1.0 | 77.3% | Con hold |
| West Bromwich | Lab | 938 | 2.5 | 74.8% | Lab gain from Con |
| West Ham Plaistow | Lab | 11,763 | 46.6 | 53.1% | Lab hold |
| West Ham Silvertown | Lab | 13,901 | 61.9 | 53.4% | Lab hold |
| West Ham Stratford | Lab | 5,975 | 26.1 | 57.1% | Lab hold |
| West Ham Upton | Lab | 1,665 | 6.5 | 62.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Westminster Abbey | Con | 12,862 | 55.0 | 49.2% | Con hold |
| Westminster St George'S | Con | 20,781 | 69.1 | 55.2% | Con hold |
| Westmorland | Con | 12,217 | 37.0 | 73.8% | Con hold |
| Wigan | Lab | 10,304 | 22.6 | 81.7% | Lab hold |
| Willesden East | Con | 10,090 | 22.8 | 62.0% | Con hold |
| Willesden West | Lab | 2,930 | 8.2 | 64.3% | Lab gain from Con |
| Wiltshire Chippenham | Con | 5,421 | 18.8 | 77.5% | Con hold |
| Wiltshire Devizes | Con | 4,535 | 18.6 | 72.2% | Con hold |
| Wiltshire Salisbury | Con | 12,448 | 43.0 | 66.2% | Con hold |
| Wiltshire Swindon | Con | 975 | 2.4 | 84.3% | Con hold |
| Wiltshire Westbury | Con | 5,015 | 15.6 | 80.1% | Con hold |
| Wimbledon | Con | 19,364 | 35.7 | 67.6% | Con hold |
| Wolverhampton Bilston | Con | 869 | 2.4 | 70.9% | Con hold |
| Wolverhampton East | Lib | 4,000 | 12.2 | 73.3% | Lib hold |
| Wolverhampton West | Con | 4,830 | 13.5 | 72.4% | Con hold |
| Woolwich East | Lab | 4,842 | 16.0 | 71.3% | Lab hold |
| Woolwich West | Con | 7,276 | 17.3 | 75.8% | Con hold |
| Worcester | Con | 6,513 | 24.6 | 76.8% | Con hold |
| Worcestershire Bewdley | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Worcestershire Evesham | Con | 12,493 | 43.4 | 66.4% | Con hold |
| Worcestershire Kidderminster | Con | 16,009 | 39.1 | 60.2% | Con hold |
| Worcestershire Stourbridge | Con | 5,301 | 9.3 | 70.9% | Con hold |
| York | Con | 6,274 | 14.1 | 82.5% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (East Riding) Buckrose | Con | 3,327 | 10.1 | 78.4% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (East Riding) Holderness | Con | 11,901 | 28.7 | 72.2% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (East Riding) Howdenshire | Con | 10,318 | 36.3 | 69.2% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (North Riding) Cleveland | Con | 2,732 | 5.4 | 81.2% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (North Riding) Richmond | Con | 17,719 | 54.6 | 68.1% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (North Riding) Scarborough and Whitby | Con | 6,542 | 15.2 | 74.7% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (North Riding) Thirsk and Malton | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Barkston Ash | Con | 9,189 | 21.8 | 78.5% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Colne Valley | Lab | 3,779 | 8.9 | 76.0% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Don Valley | Lab | 18,259 | 37.9 | 70.0% | Lab hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Doncaster | Lab | 7,952 | 15.3 | 77.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Elland | Con | 1,642 | 4.4 | 77.2% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Hemsworth | Lab | 21,266 | 60.2 | 72.3% | Lab hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Keighley | Lab | 368 | 0.9 | 78.9% | Lab gain from Con |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Normanton | Lab | 20,599 | 62.8 | 77.7% | Lab hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Penistone | Lab | 3,086 | 6.9 | 73.3% | Lab gain from Con |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Pontefract | Lab | 2,526 | 6.8 | 75.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Pudsey and Otley | Con | 11,425 | 26.7 | 76.0% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Ripon | Con | 21,688 | 54.3 | 68.6% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Rother Valley | Lab | 20,364 | 44.1 | 73.8% | Lab hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Rothwell | Lab | 14,120 | 28.9 | 75.4% | Lab hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Shipley | Lab | 4,507 | 10.1 | 77.5% | Lab gain from Con |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Skipton | Con | 5,059 | 12.5 | 79.6% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Sowerby | Con | 2,672 | 7.7 | 75.9% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Spen Valley | Nat Lib | 642 | 1.5 | 77.1% | Nat Lib hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Wentworth | Lab | 29,304 | 64.2 | 73.4% | Lab hold |
Questions and answers
Who won in England at the 1935 general election?
The Conservatives won 315 of the 485 seats in England, with 49.4% of the vote.
How many seats were there in England in 1935?
485 constituencies.
Official results House of Commons Library, General election results from 1918 to 2019. Contains Parliamentary information licensed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0. How we use this data