England: 1922 general election results
How England voted at the 1922 general election: the Conservatives won 298 of 485 seats with 41.5% of the vote. Every constituency result.
| Party | Seats | Change | Votes | Share | Change | Share bar | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | 298 | −11 | 4,668,587 | 41.5% | −1.3 | ||
| Labour | 92 | +52 | 3,241,354 | 28.8% | +5.8 | ||
| Liberal | 42 | +18 | 2,216,196 | 19.7% | +5.0 | ||
| National Liberal | 26 | new | 855,267 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Independent Conservative | 3 | +3 | 86,252 | 0.8% | +0.3 | ||
| Independent | 2 | −1 | 95,973 | 0.9% | −1.0 | ||
| Others | 2 | −1 | 79,504 | 0.7% | −1.1 | ||
| 1 other parties and independents | 9,693 | 0.09% | |||||
Change compared with the 1918 general election in England.
Constituencies
Download CSV| Constituency | Winner | Majority | % | Turnout | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accrington | Lab | 5,054 | 13.6 | 88.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Ashton under Lyne | Con | 3,172 | 15.2 | 83.3% | Con hold |
| Barnsley | Lab | 2,717 | 10.2 | 75.7% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Barrow in Furness | Con | 1,927 | 6.2 | 87.1% | Con hold |
| Bath | Con | 4,967 | 18.3 | 82.4% | Con hold |
| Batley and Morley | Lab | 5,562 | 17.1 | 85.2% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Battersea North | Lab | 2,021 | 9.0 | 56.5% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Battersea South | Con | 6,635 | 23.1 | 65.5% | Con hold |
| Bedfordshire Bedford | Con | 7,746 | 29.0 | 79.1% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Bedfordshire Luton | Con | 3,164 | 10.4 | 81.0% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Bedfordshire Mid | Lib | 2,737 | 13.0 | 70.1% | Lib gain from Con |
| Berkshire Abingdon | Con | 540 | 2.6 | 77.1% | Con hold |
| Berkshire Newbury | Con | 3,178 | 14.8 | 69.7% | Con hold |
| Berkshire Windsor | Con | 10,417 | 42.4 | 65.7% | Con hold |
| Bermondsey Rotherhithe | Con | 46 | 0.3 | 63.4% | Con hold |
| Bermondsey West Bermondsey | Lab | 2,325 | 13.7 | 64.6% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Bethnal Green North East | Lib | 115 | 0.7 | 58.8% | Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Bethnal Green South West | Lib | 1,118 | 8.8 | 59.9% | Lib gain from Con |
| Birkenhead East | Lib | 3,945 | 15.5 | 77.5% | Lib gain from Con |
| Birkenhead West | Con | 1,805 | 8.0 | 75.6% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Aston | Con | 5,634 | 21.5 | 72.5% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Deritend | Con | 4,808 | 20.1 | 64.7% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Duddeston | Con | 4,760 | 22.2 | 62.3% | Con gain from Co Lab |
| Birmingham Edgbaston | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Birmingham Erdington | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Birmingham Handsworth | Con | 6,069 | 19.2 | 82.9% | Con hold |
| Birmingham King'S Norton | Con | 1,853 | 8.7 | 74.0% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Ladywood | Con | 2,443 | 10.3 | 70.5% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Moseley | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Birmingham Sparkbrook | Con | 6,043 | 22.5 | 71.0% | Con hold |
| Birmingham West Birmingham | Con | 5,806 | 23.2 | 67.1% | Con hold |
| Birmingham Yardley | Con | 4,352 | 16.2 | 70.5% | Con hold |
| Blackburn | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 88.4% | |
| Blackpool | Con | 166 | 0.5 | 78.3% | Con hold |
| Bolton | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 87.2% | |
| Bootle | Lib | 3,409 | 14.5 | 71.1% | Lib gain from Con |
| Bournemouth | Con | 5,509 | 18.4 | 79.8% | Con hold |
| Bradford Central | Lab | 2,125 | 6.3 | 75.4% | Lab gain from Con |
| Bradford East | Lab | 3,647 | 12.2 | 81.4% | Lab gain from Co Lab |
| Bradford North | Con | 1,252 | 4.5 | 84.0% | Con hold |
| Bradford South | Lib | 906 | 2.6 | 82.2% | Lib gain from Con |
| Brigg | Con | 6,278 | 25.5 | 80.3% | Con hold |
| Brighton | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 70.1% | |
| Bristol Central | Con | 3,265 | 11.7 | 72.0% | Con hold |
| Bristol East | Nat Lib | 151 | 0.6 | 77.5% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Bristol North | Nat Lib | 7,928 | 29.3 | 73.2% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Bristol South | Nat Lib | 3,549 | 12.3 | 75.9% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Bristol West | Con | 7,024 | 24.0 | 76.9% | Con hold |
| Bromley | Con | 7,675 | 25.0 | 66.3% | Con hold |
| Buckinghamshire Aylesbury | Con | 571 | 2.2 | 71.4% | Con hold |
| Buckinghamshire Buckingham | Con | 6,408 | 23.0 | 76.9% | Con hold |
| Buckinghamshire Wycombe | Con | 4,473 | 14.3 | 69.2% | Con hold |
| Burnley | Lab | 2,654 | 6.0 | 88.7% | Lab hold |
| Bury | Con | 1,187 | 4.5 | 81.3% | Con hold |
| Camberwell Dulwich | Con | 7,313 | 35.2 | 64.0% | Con hold |
| Camberwell North | Lab | 254 | 1.6 | 56.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Camberwell North West | Nat Lib | 3,157 | 18.8 | 53.6% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Camberwell Peckham | Con | 4,479 | 17.7 | 66.1% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Cambridge | Con | 4,233 | 18.4 | 81.2% | Con hold |
| Cambridgeshire | Con | 679 | 2.6 | 70.8% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Carlisle | Lab | 1,301 | 6.2 | 84.0% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Chelsea | Con | 8,924 | 49.7 | 63.1% | Con hold |
| Cheltenham | Con | 3,146 | 16.0 | 81.8% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Altrincham | Con | 7,669 | 21.3 | 79.8% | Con hold |
| Cheshire City of Chester | Con | 6,524 | 29.6 | 81.2% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Crewe | Lab | 555 | 1.9 | 80.9% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Cheshire Eddisbury | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Cheshire Knutsford | Con | 4,262 | 15.8 | 77.2% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Macclesfield | Con | 5,348 | 16.3 | 86.0% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Northwich | Con | 2,388 | 8.4 | 71.6% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Stalybridge and Hyde | Con | 6,951 | 19.8 | 81.1% | Con hold |
| Cheshire Wirral | Con | 4,874 | 19.3 | 74.0% | Con hold |
| City of London | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Cornwall Bodmin | Lib | 1,825 | 6.8 | 80.4% | Lib gain from Con |
| Cornwall Camborne | Nat Lib | 268 | 1.3 | 60.5% | Nat Lib gain from Lib |
| Cornwall Northern | Nat Lib | unopposed | — | — | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Cornwall Penryn and Falmouth | Con | 2,687 | 9.9 | 72.5% | Con hold |
| Cornwall St Ives | Con | 1,372 | 7.1 | 65.6% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Coventry | Con | 4,697 | 9.5 | 80.8% | Con hold |
| Croydon North | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Croydon South | Con | 6,414 | 19.8 | 66.4% | Con hold |
| Cumberland Northern | Con | 271 | 1.6 | 79.9% | Con hold |
| Cumberland Penrith and Cockermouth | Lib | 378 | 2.1 | 83.0% | Lib gain from Con |
| Cumberland Whitehaven | Lab | 1,979 | 8.2 | 87.0% | Lab gain from Con |
| Cumberland Workington | Lab | 2,482 | 9.3 | 83.7% | Lab hold |
| Darlington | Con | 4,238 | 15.8 | 88.0% | Con hold |
| Daventry | Con | 4,205 | 19.2 | 72.1% | Con hold |
| Deptford | Lab | 1,825 | 5.2 | 66.2% | Lab hold |
| Derby | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 84.0% | |
| Derbyshire Belper | Lib | 4,552 | 22.3 | 63.6% | Lib hold |
| Derbyshire Chesterfield | Lib | unopposed | — | — | Lib hold |
| Derbyshire Clay Cross | Lab | 6,912 | 30.3 | 72.1% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Derbyshire High Peak | Con | 7,194 | 25.3 | 82.9% | Con hold |
| Derbyshire Ilkeston | Lab | 1,084 | 4.6 | 76.8% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Derbyshire North Eastern | Lab | 15 | 0.1 | 77.3% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Derbyshire Southern | Con | 4,463 | 13.0 | 79.8% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Derbyshire Western | Lib | 87 | 0.3 | 86.1% | Lib hold |
| Devonshire Barnstaple | Con | 174 | 0.6 | 83.1% | Con gain from Lib |
| Devonshire Honiton | Con | 2,568 | 11.0 | 79.1% | Con hold |
| Devonshire South Molton | Lib | unopposed | — | — | Lib hold |
| Devonshire Tavistock | Lib | 1,951 | 9.1 | 77.6% | Lib gain from Con |
| Devonshire Tiverton | Con | 74 | 0.3 | 80.1% | Con hold |
| Devonshire Torquay | Con | 1,251 | 4.5 | 78.5% | Con hold |
| Devonshire Totnes | Con | 1,500 | 4.8 | 78.1% | Con hold |
| Dewsbury | Lab | 756 | 3.2 | 84.0% | Lab gain from Con |
| Dorset Eastern | Ind Con | 5,599 | 22.0 | 80.2% | Ind Con gain from Co Lib |
| Dorset Northern | Lib | 936 | 4.5 | 84.2% | Lib gain from Con |
| Dorset Southern | Con | 7,464 | 35.3 | 75.2% | Con hold |
| Dorset Western | Con | 4,548 | 24.3 | 78.5% | Con hold |
| Dudley | Con | 4,354 | 20.4 | 82.5% | Con hold |
| Durham Barnard Castle | Con | 219 | 1.3 | 78.5% | Con gain from Lab |
| Durham Bishop Auckland | Lab | 1,927 | 7.4 | 74.8% | Lab hold |
| Durham Blaydon | Lab | 6,759 | 24.8 | 77.0% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Durham Chester Le Street | Lab | 10,961 | 37.0 | 76.6% | Lab hold |
| Durham Consett | Lab | 4,599 | 14.8 | 82.0% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Durham Durham | Lab | 2,672 | 10.5 | 81.9% | Lab gain from Con |
| Durham Houghton Le Spring | Lab | 7,056 | 25.1 | 78.4% | Lab hold |
| Durham Jarrow | Lab | 7,042 | 22.1 | 82.2% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Durham Seaham | Lab | 11,888 | 35.2 | 81.9% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Durham Sedgefield | Lab | 689 | 3.1 | 76.1% | Lab gain from Con |
| Durham Spennymoor | Lab | 6,199 | 22.6 | 81.2% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Ealing | Con | 8,379 | 39.2 | 65.8% | Con hold |
| East Ham North | Con | 468 | 1.9 | 69.8% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| East Ham South | Lab | 3,999 | 18.2 | 66.3% | Lab gain from Co Lab |
| Eccles | Lab | 803 | 2.9 | 77.7% | Lab gain from Con |
| Edmonton | Lab | 1,709 | 9.2 | 62.8% | Lab gain from Con |
| Essex Chelmsford | Con | 4,887 | 22.8 | 61.0% | Con hold |
| Essex Colchester | Con | 3,097 | 13.4 | 77.9% | Con hold |
| Essex Epping | Con | 5,072 | 19.9 | 63.5% | Con hold |
| Essex Harwich | Lib | 764 | 3.8 | 71.6% | Lib gain from Con |
| Essex Maldon | Con | 4,252 | 19.4 | 74.8% | Con hold |
| Essex Romford | Nat Lib | 4,103 | 17.1 | 59.2% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Essex Saffron Walden | Con | 3,047 | 13.5 | 71.1% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Essex South Eastern | Con | 2,063 | 8.3 | 58.9% | Con hold |
| Exeter | Con | 3,406 | 13.5 | 85.6% | Con hold |
| Finsbury | Con | 2,998 | 14.3 | 54.3% | Con hold |
| Fulham East | Con | 7,889 | 36.6 | 58.0% | Con hold |
| Fulham West | Con | 6,665 | 28.9 | 58.4% | Con hold |
| Gainsborough | Con | 1,799 | 8.5 | 77.6% | Con hold |
| Gateshead | Lab | 5,371 | 12.5 | 78.4% | Lab gain from Con |
| Gloucester | Con | 51 | 0.2 | 84.7% | Con hold |
| Gloucestershire Cirencester and Tewkesbury | Con | 7,268 | 28.3 | 71.3% | Con hold |
| Gloucestershire Forest of Dean | Lab | 4,844 | 23.5 | 72.0% | Lab hold |
| Gloucestershire Stroud | Con | 5,682 | 19.7 | 79.9% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Gloucestershire Thornbury | Con | 104 | 0.4 | 77.9% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Grantham | Lib | 428 | 1.5 | 79.5% | Lib gain from Con |
| Great Yarmouth | Lib | 919 | 4.3 | 79.0% | Lib gain from Con |
| Greenwich | Con | 6,074 | 21.9 | 60.4% | Con hold |
| Grimsby | Con | 9,499 | 25.0 | 72.3% | Con hold |
| Hackney Central | Nat Lib | 2,970 | 14.1 | 60.3% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Hackney North | Con | 4,615 | 21.6 | 63.5% | Con hold |
| Hackney South | Con | 4,741 | 20.4 | 70.0% | Con gain from Ind |
| Halifax | Lib | unopposed | — | — | Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Hammersmith North | Con | 2,953 | 16.5 | 60.0% | Con hold |
| Hammersmith South | Con | 4,480 | 25.9 | 56.4% | Con hold |
| Hampshire Aldershot | Con | 5,656 | 34.8 | 64.8% | Con hold |
| Hampshire Basingstoke | Con | 5,734 | 25.7 | 66.9% | Con hold |
| Hampshire Fareham | Con | 10,763 | 46.3 | 67.4% | Con hold |
| Hampshire New Forest and Christchurch | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Hampshire Petersfield | Con | 5,564 | 28.3 | 65.7% | Con hold |
| Hampshire Winchester | Con | 6,638 | 30.6 | 63.8% | Con hold |
| Hampstead | Con | 9,014 | 36.9 | 63.1% | Con hold |
| Hastings | Con | 7,499 | 36.6 | 71.2% | Con hold |
| Herefordshire Hereford | Con | 9,044 | 52.5 | 62.0% | Con hold |
| Herefordshire Leominster | Con | 1,280 | 6.2 | 79.0% | Con hold |
| Hertfordshire Hemel Hempstead | Con | 6,121 | 34.8 | 66.0% | Con hold |
| Hertfordshire Hertford | Con | 4,872 | 27.2 | 54.1% | Con gain from Ind |
| Hertfordshire Hitchin | Con | 5,075 | 24.0 | 66.2% | Con hold |
| Hertfordshire St Albans | Con | 3,932 | 15.6 | 71.1% | Con hold |
| Hertfordshire Watford | Con | 3,479 | 14.2 | 69.0% | Con hold |
| Holborn | Con | 5,239 | 41.1 | 47.2% | Con hold |
| Holland With Boston | Lab | 591 | 1.9 | 76.9% | Lab hold |
| Horncastle | Lib | 1,639 | 8.2 | 81.5% | Lib gain from Con |
| Hornsey | Con | 2,223 | 6.4 | 77.2% | Con hold |
| Huddersfield | Lib | 206 | 0.4 | 83.1% | Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Huntingdonshire | Con | 4,956 | 24.9 | 70.7% | Con hold |
| Hythe | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Ilford | Con | 6,446 | 20.3 | 70.5% | Con hold |
| Ipswich | Con | 2,210 | 6.9 | 82.4% | Con hold |
| Isle of Ely | Con | 6,193 | 23.3 | 72.0% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Isle of Wight | Lib | 1,582 | 4.7 | 75.4% | Lib gain from Con |
| Islington East | Con | 3,847 | 14.8 | 59.4% | Con hold |
| Islington North | Con | 5,527 | 19.2 | 61.1% | Con hold |
| Islington South | Con | 525 | 2.4 | 64.2% | Con hold |
| Islington West | Con | 692 | 3.7 | 57.5% | Con hold |
| Kensington North | Con | 6,103 | 26.3 | 54.9% | Con hold |
| Kensington South | Con | 10,796 | 52.1 | 58.1% | Con hold |
| Kent Ashford | Con | 8,661 | 38.3 | 64.2% | Con hold |
| Kent Canterbury | Con | 8,315 | 42.4 | 56.8% | Con hold |
| Kent Chislehurst | Con | 5,545 | 30.7 | 63.7% | Con hold |
| Kent Dartford | Oth | 1,918 | 5.7 | 71.2% | Oth gain from Co Lib |
| Kent Dover | Con | 10,097 | 34.6 | 77.6% | Con hold |
| Kent Faversham | Con | 2,579 | 10.4 | 61.7% | Con hold |
| Kent Gravesend | Con | 986 | 4.9 | 63.0% | Con hold |
| Kent Isle of Thanet | Con | 5,890 | 22.4 | 68.4% | Con hold |
| Kent Maidstone | Con | 33 | 0.1 | 78.5% | Con hold |
| Kent Sevenoaks | Con | 5,196 | 27.5 | 60.9% | Con hold |
| Kent Tonbridge | Con | 7,132 | 25.5 | 72.5% | Con hold |
| Kettering | Con | 309 | 1.1 | 81.0% | Con gain from Oth |
| Kingston upon Hull Central | Lib | 3,027 | 10.9 | 79.1% | Lib gain from Con |
| Kingston upon Hull East | Con | 3,537 | 12.7 | 82.5% | Con hold |
| Kingston upon Hull North West | Con | 3,700 | 14.2 | 77.0% | Con hold |
| Kingston upon Hull South West | Lib | 763 | 3.0 | 72.5% | Lib hold |
| Kingston upon Thames | Con | 7,573 | 33.4 | 59.3% | Con hold |
| Lambeth Brixton | Con | 1,968 | 9.6 | 52.8% | Con hold |
| Lambeth Kennington | Con | 2,411 | 11.3 | 58.4% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Lambeth North | Lib | 770 | 4.1 | 62.2% | Lib hold |
| Lambeth Norwood | Con | 9,868 | 37.2 | 61.7% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Chorley | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Lancashire Clitheroe | Con | 2,675 | 9.4 | 85.3% | Con gain from Lab |
| Lancashire Darwen | Con | 274 | 1.0 | 91.4% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Farnworth | Lab | 3,354 | 11.4 | 84.8% | Lab gain from Con |
| Lancashire Fylde | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Lancashire Heywood and Radcliffe | Nat Lib | 3,682 | 10.7 | 83.8% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Lancashire Ince | Lab | 9,075 | 35.5 | 80.0% | Lab hold |
| Lancashire Lancaster | Con | 10,528 | 36.8 | 79.2% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Lonsdale | Con | 6,240 | 28.6 | 77.3% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Middleton and Prestwich | Nat Lib | 4,327 | 17.1 | 68.4% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Lancashire Mossley | Ind | 4,577 | 16.8 | 67.5% | Ind gain from Co Lib |
| Lancashire Newton | Lab | 4,098 | 18.5 | 86.1% | Lab hold |
| Lancashire Ormskirk | Con | 3,547 | 17.5 | 67.8% | Con gain from Lab |
| Lancashire Royton | Con | 1,093 | 3.7 | 83.4% | Con hold |
| Lancashire Stretford | Nat Lib | 10,452 | 37.4 | 71.9% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Lancashire Waterloo | Con | 6,667 | 34.6 | 69.4% | Con hold |
| Lancashire West Houghton | Lab | 2,909 | 10.9 | 85.4% | Lab hold |
| Lancashire Widnes | Con | 1,782 | 6.5 | 86.8% | Con hold |
| Leeds Central | Con | 6,293 | 22.3 | 66.1% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Leeds North | Con | 6,541 | 24.4 | 71.8% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Leeds North East | Con | 4,452 | 16.6 | 74.2% | Con hold |
| Leeds South | Lab | 1,830 | 7.4 | 69.8% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Leeds South East | Lab | 4,122 | 17.7 | 66.2% | Lab hold |
| Leeds West | Lib | 904 | 3.5 | 67.6% | Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Leicester East | Nat Lib | 1,314 | 4.5 | 76.9% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Leicester South | Con | 109 | 0.4 | 71.7% | Con hold |
| Leicester West | Lab | 4,792 | 16.7 | 72.5% | Lab gain from Co Lab |
| Leicestershire Bosworth | Con | 2,511 | 9.1 | 81.0% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Leicestershire Harborough | Con | 2,929 | 13.3 | 76.9% | Con hold |
| Leicestershire Loughborough | Nat Lib | unopposed | — | — | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Leicestershire Melton | Con | 1,791 | 7.2 | 79.9% | Con hold |
| Leigh | Lab | 3,727 | 11.2 | 89.9% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Lewisham East | Con | 8,324 | 28.7 | 64.0% | Con hold |
| Lewisham West | Con | 7,747 | 31.4 | 58.1% | Con hold |
| Leyton East | Con | 1,566 | 7.7 | 72.2% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Leyton West | Con | 4,136 | 17.3 | 69.0% | Con hold |
| Lincoln | Con | 4,829 | 18.1 | 85.9% | Con hold |
| Liverpool East Toxteth | Con | 5,165 | 20.6 | 74.2% | Con hold |
| Liverpool Edge Hill | Con | 4,666 | 19.7 | 70.5% | Con hold |
| Liverpool Everton | Con | 4,067 | 21.1 | 70.3% | Con hold |
| Liverpool Exchange | Con | 3,036 | 10.7 | 74.8% | Con hold |
| Liverpool Fairfield | Con | 8,838 | 44.7 | 64.0% | Con hold |
| Liverpool Kirkdale | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Liverpool Scotland | Oth | unopposed | — | — | Oth hold |
| Liverpool Walton | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Liverpool Wavertree | Con | 5,431 | 23.3 | 69.5% | Con hold |
| Liverpool West Derby | Con | 9,394 | 40.9 | 65.0% | Con hold |
| Liverpool West Toxteth | Con | 4,821 | 19.1 | 69.1% | Con hold |
| Louth | Lib | 883 | 4.0 | 78.5% | Lib gain from SF |
| Manchester Ardwick | Lab | 1,254 | 4.7 | 71.4% | Lab gain from Con |
| Manchester Blackley | Con | 2,804 | 13.5 | 81.4% | Con hold |
| Manchester Clayton | Con | 11 | 0.0 | 82.9% | Con hold |
| Manchester Exchange | Con | 3,771 | 15.7 | 61.2% | Con hold |
| Manchester Gorton | Lab | 2,001 | 7.1 | 79.0% | Lab hold |
| Manchester Hulme | Con | 4,053 | 14.8 | 70.1% | Con hold |
| Manchester Moss Side | Con | 5,189 | 22.3 | 70.4% | Con hold |
| Manchester Platting | Lab | 869 | 2.7 | 81.8% | Lab hold |
| Manchester Rusholme | Con | 5,344 | 21.7 | 77.8% | Con hold |
| Manchester Withington | Con | 670 | 3.0 | 77.4% | Con hold |
| Middlesbrough East | Con | 1,278 | 5.6 | 78.8% | Con gain from Lib |
| Middlesbrough West | Lib | 9,389 | 38.7 | 68.4% | Lib hold |
| Middlesex Acton | Con | 4,866 | 23.8 | 67.1% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Brentford and Chiswick | Con | 2,346 | 13.1 | 64.2% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Enfield | Con | 1,905 | 8.8 | 71.8% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Finchley | Con | 1,443 | 6.5 | 72.4% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Harrow | Ind | 7,422 | 32.1 | 65.1% | Ind gain from Con |
| Middlesex Hendon | Con | 11,752 | 42.4 | 75.8% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Spelthorne | Con | 5,834 | 29.4 | 53.9% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Twickenham | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Middlesex Uxbridge | Con | 5,099 | 21.7 | 73.0% | Con hold |
| Middlesex Wood Green | Con | 12,526 | 40.0 | 66.5% | Con hold |
| Morpeth | Lab | 5,019 | 16.2 | 72.1% | Lab hold |
| Nelson and Colne | Lab | 6,172 | 16.9 | 83.2% | Lab hold |
| Newcastle under Lyme | Lab | 4,930 | 20.5 | 79.5% | Lab gain from Ind Lib |
| Newcastle upon Tyne Central | Lab | 5,070 | 20.1 | 72.5% | Lab gain from Con |
| Newcastle upon Tyne East | Lab | 3,085 | 13.2 | 73.7% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Newcastle upon Tyne North | Con | 6,914 | 28.4 | 73.9% | Con hold |
| Newcastle upon Tyne West | Lab | 155 | 0.6 | 80.5% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Norfolk Eastern | Con | 308 | 1.4 | 70.2% | Con hold |
| Norfolk King'S Lynn | Con | 1,179 | 4.5 | 75.5% | Con hold |
| Norfolk Northern | Lab | 1,029 | 4.5 | 75.2% | Lab gain from Con |
| Norfolk South Western | Nat Lib | 1,777 | 9.3 | 59.1% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Norfolk Southern | Con | 2,575 | 11.3 | 70.8% | Con gain from Lib |
| Northampton | Nat Lib | 5,476 | 14.3 | 85.5% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Northumberland Berwick upon Tweed | Nat Lib | 4,579 | 23.7 | 66.2% | Nat Lib gain from Lib |
| Northumberland Hexham | Con | 2,883 | 13.8 | 79.3% | Con hold |
| Northumberland Wansbeck | Lab | 4,883 | 13.8 | 76.6% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Norwich | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 78.5% | |
| Nottingham Central | Lib | 22 | 0.1 | 68.9% | Lib gain from Con |
| Nottingham East | Con | 3,912 | 19.3 | 66.2% | Con hold |
| Nottingham South | Con | 10,452 | 52.6 | 66.3% | Con hold |
| Nottingham West | Lab | 4,737 | 21.5 | 72.5% | Lab hold |
| Nottinghamshire Bassetlaw | Con | 2,442 | 10.4 | 74.4% | Con hold |
| Nottinghamshire Broxtowe | Lab | 371 | 1.6 | 59.8% | Lab hold |
| Nottinghamshire Mansfield | Lib | 1,275 | 4.1 | 74.3% | Lib gain from Lab |
| Nottinghamshire Newark | Con | 7,045 | 29.6 | 79.9% | Con hold |
| Nottinghamshire Rushcliffe | Con | 3,561 | 13.7 | 69.9% | Con hold |
| Oldham | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 78.8% | |
| Oxford | Lib | 3,806 | 18.0 | 83.8% | Lib gain from Con |
| Oxfordshire Banbury | Con | 4,606 | 17.2 | 76.4% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Oxfordshire Henley | Con | 1,341 | 6.2 | 69.6% | Con hold |
| Paddington North | Con | 4,348 | 25.2 | 45.6% | Con hold |
| Paddington South | Con | 4,935 | 34.1 | 50.5% | Con hold |
| Peterborough | Con | 4,892 | 17.2 | 80.6% | Con hold |
| Plymouth Devonport | Con | 1,921 | 7.8 | 79.1% | Con hold |
| Plymouth Drake | Con | 3,339 | 12.5 | 74.4% | Con hold |
| Plymouth Sutton | Con | 3,093 | 10.5 | 78.0% | Con hold |
| Poplar Bow and Bromley | Lab | 6,776 | 28.2 | 69.9% | Lab gain from Con |
| Poplar South Poplar | Lab | 4,338 | 17.6 | 66.5% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Portsmouth Central | Con | 7 | 0.0 | 77.9% | Con gain from Lib |
| Portsmouth North | Con | 7,360 | 29.0 | 71.9% | Con hold |
| Portsmouth South | Con | 10,880 | 37.5 | 73.7% | Con hold |
| Preston | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 87.8% | |
| Reading | Con | 1,760 | 4.7 | 83.6% | Con hold |
| Richmond (Surrey) | Ind Con | 6,043 | 25.3 | 68.8% | Ind Con gain from Con |
| Rochdale | Lab | 2,768 | 6.8 | 87.1% | Lab gain from Con |
| Rochester Chatham | Con | 653 | 3.0 | 69.8% | Con hold |
| Rochester Gillingham | Con | 3,481 | 16.3 | 72.3% | Con hold |
| Rossendale | Con | 1,852 | 6.1 | 85.0% | Con hold |
| Rotherham | Con | 644 | 1.9 | 81.6% | Con hold |
| Rutland and Stamford | Con | 3,042 | 13.8 | 81.2% | Con hold |
| Salford North | Lab | 19 | 0.1 | 78.7% | Lab hold |
| Salford South | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Salford West | Con | 3,406 | 12.6 | 81.8% | Con hold |
| Sheffield Attercliffe | Lab | 8,644 | 36.4 | 68.6% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Sheffield Brightside | Lab | 5,743 | 20.8 | 75.0% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Sheffield Central | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Sheffield Ecclesall | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Sheffield Hallam | Con | 4,232 | 18.7 | 73.7% | Con hold |
| Sheffield Hillsborough | Lab | 3,318 | 12.3 | 74.7% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Sheffield Park | Nat Lib | 964 | 4.4 | 73.0% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Shoreditch | Nat Lib | 250 | 1.0 | 47.4% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Shropshire Ludlow | Con | 5,808 | 32.7 | 71.6% | Con hold |
| Shropshire Oswestry | Con | 6,177 | 24.1 | 80.2% | Con hold |
| Shropshire Shrewsbury | Con | 1,598 | 7.8 | 78.8% | Con hold |
| Shropshire the Wrekin | Con | 1,049 | 4.7 | 67.8% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Smethwick | Lab | 382 | 1.5 | 75.9% | Lab hold |
| Somerset Bridgwater | Con | 119 | 0.5 | 78.2% | Con hold |
| Somerset Frome | Con | 706 | 2.4 | 82.2% | Con hold |
| Somerset Taunton | Lib | 3,013 | 12.9 | 79.1% | Lib gain from Con |
| Somerset Wells | Con | 3,054 | 14.3 | 77.8% | Con hold |
| Somerset Weston Super Mare | Con | 2,874 | 10.2 | 77.9% | Con hold |
| Somerset Yeovil | Con | 5,887 | 23.5 | 73.0% | Con hold |
| South Shields | Lib | 25 | 0.1 | 76.2% | Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Southampton | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 68.5% | |
| Southend on Sea | Con | 6,881 | 23.8 | 68.0% | Con hold |
| Southport | Con | 1,665 | 6.5 | 76.3% | Con hold |
| Southwark Central | Nat Lib | 5,000 | 31.2 | 52.7% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Southwark North | Nat Lib | 1,112 | 8.1 | 56.1% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Southwark South East | Nat Lib | 2,280 | 12.9 | 58.2% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| St Helens | Lab | 6,144 | 17.4 | 80.0% | Lab hold |
| St Marylebone | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| St Pancras North | Con | 991 | 4.1 | 66.0% | Con hold |
| St Pancras South East | Con | 3,144 | 17.1 | 60.1% | Con hold |
| St Pancras South West | Con | 2,756 | 16.4 | 57.9% | Con hold |
| Staffordshire Burton | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Staffordshire Cannock | Lab | 773 | 2.9 | 66.9% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Staffordshire Kingswinford | Lab | 919 | 3.1 | 75.2% | Lab hold |
| Staffordshire Leek | Lab | 384 | 1.5 | 78.7% | Lab hold |
| Staffordshire Lichfield | Nat Lib | 1,278 | 6.4 | 62.0% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Staffordshire Stafford | Con | 3,318 | 17.8 | 76.7% | Con hold |
| Staffordshire Stone | Con | 544 | 2.7 | 71.4% | Con hold |
| Stepney Limehouse | Lab | 1,899 | 10.9 | 57.8% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Stepney Mile End | Con | 795 | 5.4 | 64.2% | Con hold |
| Stepney Whitechapel and St George'S | Lab | 428 | 2.7 | 64.1% | Lab gain from Lib |
| Stockport | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 83.4% | |
| Stockton on Tees | Nat Lib | 1,213 | 3.7 | 85.9% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Stoke Newington | Con | 4,016 | 25.9 | 65.0% | Con hold |
| Stoke on Trent Burslem | Lab | 205 | 0.9 | 78.2% | Lab hold |
| Stoke on Trent Hanley | Lab | 4,430 | 20.1 | 67.4% | Lab gain from Co Lab |
| Stoke on Trent Stoke | Nat Lib | 6,163 | 22.7 | 68.0% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Suffolk (East) Eye | Lib | 3,531 | 20.1 | 54.0% | Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Suffolk (East) Lowestoft | Con | 7,949 | 32.0 | 71.0% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Suffolk (East) Woodbridge | Con | 2,920 | 13.4 | 69.1% | Con hold |
| Suffolk (West) Bury St Edmunds | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Suffolk (West) Sudbury | Con | 1,888 | 12.2 | 59.3% | Con gain from Lib |
| Sunderland | 2-member seat: not split by party in the source | — | — | 81.6% | |
| Surrey Chertsey | Con | 4,853 | 20.8 | 58.2% | Con hold |
| Surrey Eastern | Con | 8,831 | 54.6 | 64.5% | Con hold |
| Surrey Epsom | Con | 9,678 | 42.4 | 65.3% | Con hold |
| Surrey Farnham | Con | 9,245 | 46.5 | 56.8% | Con hold |
| Surrey Guildford | Con | 10,531 | 41.2 | 65.4% | Con hold |
| Surrey Mitcham | Con | 5,036 | 29.9 | 52.7% | Con hold |
| Surrey Reigate | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Sussex (East) East Grinstead | Con | 9,454 | 42.0 | 58.2% | Con hold |
| Sussex (East) Eastbourne | Con | 5,051 | 20.9 | 77.2% | Con hold |
| Sussex (East) Lewes | Con | 6,017 | 36.1 | 64.6% | Con hold |
| Sussex (East) Rye | Con | 3,434 | 18.7 | 62.4% | Con hold |
| Sussex (West) Chichester | Con | 12,742 | 48.6 | 57.9% | Con hold |
| Sussex (West) Horsham and Worthing | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| The Hartlepools | Lib | 567 | 1.6 | 87.2% | Lib gain from Con |
| Tottenham North | Lab | 1,858 | 8.0 | 65.4% | Lab gain from Con |
| Tottenham South | Con | 1,662 | 7.5 | 63.8% | Con hold |
| Tynemouth | Con | 4,457 | 19.1 | 83.5% | Con hold |
| Wakefield | Con | 618 | 3.1 | 84.4% | Con hold |
| Wallasey | Con | 7,524 | 27.4 | 69.2% | Con hold |
| Wallsend | Lab | 2,823 | 9.3 | 82.2% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Walsall | Lib | 325 | 0.9 | 84.4% | Lib gain from Nat |
| Walthamstow East | Con | 2,796 | 14.3 | 67.6% | Con hold |
| Walthamstow West | Lab | 2,505 | 12.4 | 63.8% | Lab gain from Co Lab |
| Wandsworth Balham and Tooting | Con | 9,195 | 36.4 | 61.1% | Con hold |
| Wandsworth Central | Con | 7,050 | 39.4 | 61.4% | Con hold |
| Wandsworth Clapham | Con | 8,366 | 36.9 | 63.0% | Con hold |
| Wandsworth Putney | Con | 4,183 | 20.3 | 61.8% | Con hold |
| Wandsworth Streatham | Con | 6,799 | 38.3 | 63.0% | Con hold |
| Warrington | Con | 1,824 | 6.3 | 84.7% | Con hold |
| Warwickshire Nuneaton | Con | 1,923 | 5.8 | 69.8% | Con hold |
| Warwickshire Rugby | Con | 3,738 | 14.9 | 76.9% | Con hold |
| Warwickshire Tamworth | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Warwickshire Warwick and Leamington | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Wednesbury | Lab | 105 | 0.3 | 85.5% | Lab hold |
| Wellingborough | Nat Lib | 3,938 | 15.1 | 79.4% | Nat Lib gain from Lab |
| West Bromwich | Lab | 2,947 | 10.5 | 85.7% | Lab hold |
| West Ham Plaistow | Lab | 5,181 | 26.6 | 54.7% | Lab hold |
| West Ham Silvertown | Lab | 7,513 | 46.3 | 49.0% | Lab gain from Oth |
| West Ham Stratford | Lab | 1,376 | 6.4 | 64.9% | Lab gain from Con |
| West Ham Upton | Con | 2,928 | 13.2 | 69.4% | Con hold |
| Westminster Abbey | Con | 11,166 | 62.0 | 49.0% | Con hold |
| Westminster St George'S | Ind Con | 3,693 | 18.4 | 62.2% | Ind Con gain from Con |
| Westmorland | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Wigan | Lab | 4,643 | 13.1 | 88.9% | Lab hold |
| Willesden East | Con | 1,314 | 5.5 | 58.4% | Con hold |
| Willesden West | Con | 799 | 3.1 | 66.7% | Con hold |
| Wiltshire Chippenham | Lib | 488 | 2.3 | 78.0% | Lib gain from Con |
| Wiltshire Devizes | Con | 3,020 | 18.7 | 64.9% | Con hold |
| Wiltshire Salisbury | Con | 323 | 1.4 | 81.1% | Con hold |
| Wiltshire Swindon | Con | 3,384 | 12.8 | 80.0% | Con hold |
| Wiltshire Westbury | Lib | 641 | 2.7 | 81.0% | Lib gain from Con |
| Wimbledon | Con | 10,124 | 43.3 | 62.0% | Con hold |
| Wolverhampton Bilston | Con | 1,905 | 8.4 | 73.8% | Con hold |
| Wolverhampton East | Lib | 2,167 | 8.6 | 80.4% | Lib hold |
| Wolverhampton West | Con | 2,548 | 7.7 | 83.5% | Con hold |
| Woolwich East | Lab | 3,906 | 14.3 | 80.4% | Lab hold |
| Woolwich West | Con | 4,903 | 20.4 | 70.1% | Con hold |
| Worcester | Lib | 773 | 4.0 | 82.4% | Lib gain from Con |
| Worcestershire Bewdley | Con | 5,444 | 32.1 | 64.7% | Con hold |
| Worcestershire Evesham | Con | 3,787 | 19.7 | 65.7% | Con hold |
| Worcestershire Kidderminster | Con | 10,508 | 36.3 | 70.0% | Con hold |
| Worcestershire Stourbridge | Con | 1,251 | 3.6 | 75.8% | Con gain from Lib |
| York | Con | 5,057 | 14.8 | 85.8% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (East Riding) Buckrose | Con | 601 | 2.6 | 82.5% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Yorkshire (East Riding) Holderness | Lib | 1,279 | 5.9 | 79.1% | Lib gain from Con |
| Yorkshire (East Riding) Howdenshire | Con | 3,727 | 21.0 | 71.1% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (North Riding) Cleveland | Con | 1,701 | 4.8 | 82.4% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (North Riding) Richmond | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (North Riding) Scarborough and Whitby | Con | 3,096 | 10.5 | 76.2% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (North Riding) Thirsk and Malton | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Barkston Ash | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Colne Valley | Lab | 1,282 | 4.0 | 78.5% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Don Valley | Lab | 4,106 | 19.5 | 65.4% | Lab gain from Co Lab |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Doncaster | Lab | 5,158 | 17.9 | 77.4% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Elland | Lab | 430 | 1.5 | 81.9% | Lab gain from Con |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Hemsworth | Lab | 5,978 | 26.4 | 76.3% | Lab hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Keighley | Lab | 4,716 | 15.6 | 81.6% | Lab gain from Con |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Normanton | Lab | 10,185 | 46.5 | 68.3% | Lab hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Penistone | Lib | 542 | 2.2 | 73.1% | Lib hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Pontefract | Lab | 626 | 2.7 | 73.9% | Lab gain from Co Lib |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Pudsey and Otley | Con | 3,957 | 14.9 | 82.0% | Con gain from Co Lib |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Ripon | Con | unopposed | — | — | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Rother Valley | Lab | unopposed | — | — | Lab hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Rothwell | Lab | 7,251 | 25.5 | 78.4% | Lab hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Shipley | Nat Lib | 1,041 | 3.5 | 81.7% | Nat Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Skipton | Con | 3,023 | 9.5 | 85.2% | Con hold |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Sowerby | Con | 3,566 | 12.1 | 83.9% | Con gain from Ind |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Spen Valley | Lib | 787 | 2.3 | 84.6% | Lib gain from Co Lib |
| Yorkshire (West Riding) Wentworth | Lab | unopposed | — | — | Lab hold |
Questions and answers
Who won in England at the 1922 general election?
The Conservatives won 298 of the 485 seats in England, with 41.5% of the vote.
How many seats were there in England in 1922?
485 constituencies.
Official results House of Commons Library, General election results from 1918 to 2019. Contains Parliamentary information licensed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0. How we use this data